SARCOPENIA IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE ON HEMODIALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/demetra.2014.10831Abstract
Elderly patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) are highly susceptible to developsarcopenia, due to the natural process of ageing and to the catabolism induced by the hemodialysis procedure.The aim of this study was first, to evaluate the prevalence of sarcopenia, dynapenia and muscle atrophyin a group of elderly patients on MHD; second, to evaluate whether the criteria applied for diagnosis ofsarcopenia proposed by international societies are able to distinguish patients with worse clinical condition,nutritional status and quality of life. This multicenter, cross-sectional study included 94 elderly MHD patients(> 60 years) from five dialysis facilities. All participants underwent anthropometric measurements, bodycomposition, handgrip strength (HGS) and laboratory measurements, and the assessment of nutritional statusby 7 point subjective global (7p-SGA) assessment. In addition, the participants answered a health relatedquality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire. For the diagnosis of sarcopenia, the criteria proposed by internationalsocieties were adopted, which included parameters indicative of low muscle mass and low muscle function.For muscle mass, we adopted the criterion of lean body mass index (LBMI) < 20 percentile for genderand age of a reference population, assessed by lean body mass from skinfold thicknesses. For the criterionof low muscle function, we adopted the HGS < 10 percentile for gender, age and arm specific side from areference population. Patients were classified as Sarcopenic (low LBMI associated with low HGS); Dynapenic(low HGS) and with Muscular atrophy (low LBMI). Sarcopenia was present in 13.8% of the patients, whiledynapenia was observed in 37.2% and muscle atrophy in 35.1%. Sarcopenia was able to distinguish patientswho had greater impairment of nutritional status and body composition. The criteria of muscle function(alone or combined with muscle mass) also identified patients with worse quality of life. In conclusion, wereport that the prevalence of sarcopenia was observed in 13.8% of the group. However, when using onlycriteria indicating reduction of strength or muscle mass, this prevalence increased to 30%. The conditionof sarcopenia distinguished patients with poor nutritional status and quality of life.
DOI 10.12957/demetra.2014.10831
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP RESPONSIBILITY
Title of the manuscript:
________________________________________________________
1. Statement of responsability
I certify that I have participated in the work above specified and take public responsibility for its content.
I certify that the manuscript represents an original work and that none of the material in the manuscript has been previously published, is included in another manuscript, or is currently under consideration for publication elsewhere, whether in printed form or in electronic media, except that described in the attachment.
In case of acceptance of this text by Demetra: Alimentação, Nutrição & Saude, I declare to be in accordance with the policy of public access and copyright adopted by Demetra, which provides as follows: (a) the authors retain the copyright and grant to the Journal the right of first publication, the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal; (b) authors are authorized to enter additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal; and (c) authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work.
2. Conflict of Interest Statement
I certify that there is no conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
Date, signature and full address of all authors.
