attentiveness, qualities of listening and the listener in the community of philosophical inquiry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2023.76451Keywords:
listening, inquiry, attentiveness, facilitation, practiceAbstract
This paper seeks to redress a predominant focus on speaking over listening in theorising the Community of Philosophical Inquiry (CPI). Frequently, where listening is discussed, the focus is on encouraging children to be active listeners. This means of describing the listening that occurs in the CPI has lost some efficacy as the language of active listening has been co-opted as a management technique focussed on making the speaker feel heard with little emphasis on the intentions or outcomes for the listener. Thus, on a cynical reading, ‘active listening’ can become reduced to performative physical indicators of listening (such as eye contact and body language), overlooking the ethical-epistemic commitments of the genuinely engaged listener. Here, rather than formulating new terms to describe listening, I propose Iris Murdoch’s account of attentiveness as an apt descriptor of the effects of truly involved listening on the self that seeks to attend to the unfolding content of the CPI and as a way of characterising the qualities of a CPI where such listening is achieved. Here, attentiveness is presented as a concept that captures the unique facets of listening as a challenge to individual participants concerned with contributing effectively to the dialogue as it unfolds within the CPI and those facilitating the dialogue. The paper briefly explores some implications for practice contexts, proposing three interventions to cultivate attentiveness in CPI participants and in facilitators (especially if they are undergraduate or postgraduate in Philosophy because philosophical identities might become a barrier to attentiveness). At its conclusion, this paper repositions listening in the CPI as a productive risk with a particular form of ‘aliveness’ aptly captured by the term attention.Downloads
References
Butnor, Ashby. (2004). “Bringing P4C Into the Undergraduate Classroom.” Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 17(1/2), 65–68. https://doi.org/10.5840/thinking2004171/224.
Chetty, Darren, & Suissa, Judith. (2016). “‘No Go Areas’: Racism and Discomfort in the Community of Inquiry.” In Maughn Rollins Gregory, Karin Murris, & Joanna Haynes (Eds.). The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children (44–51). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726625-12.
Davey, Nicholas. (2013). Unfinished Worlds: Hermeneutics, Aesthetics and Gadamer. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fiumara, Gemma Corradi. (2013). The Other Side of Language: A Philosophy of Listening. London: Routledge.
Fletcher, Natalie M. (2020). “Underestimated No More.” In Claire Elise Katz (Ed.), Growing Up with Philosophy Camp: How Learning to Think Develops Friendship, Community, and a Sense of Self (65–86). Big Ideas for Young Thinkers. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Fredriksson, Antony & Panizza, Silvia . (2022). Ethical Attention and the Self in Iris Murdoch and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 53(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2020.1836978.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (2000). “Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity, Subject and Person.” Translated by David Vesey and Peter Adamson. Continental Philosophy Review 33(3), 275–87.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (2006). A Century of Philosophy: Hans-Georg Gadamer in Conversation with Riccardo Dottori. Translated by Rod Coltman. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (2013). Truth and Method. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. Bloomsbury Revelations. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. (Original work published in 1975).
Gardner, Susan. (1996). Inquiry Is No Mere Conversation (or Discussion or Dialogue): Facilitation of Inquiry Is Hard Work! Analytic Teaching, 16(2), 102–11.
Gregory, Maughn Rollins. (2007). A Framework for Facilitating Classroom Dialogue.” Teaching Philosophy, 30(1), 59–84. https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil200730141.
Hellman, John. (2014). Simone Weil: An Introduction to Her Thought. Ontario: Wipf and Stock.
Honneth, Axel. (2003). On the Destructive Power of the Third: Gadamer and Heidegger’s Doctrine of Intersubjectivity. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 29(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453703029001830.
Jalongo, Mary Renck. (1995). Promoting Active Listening in the Classroom. Childhood Education, 72(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1995.10522637.
James, William. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York: H. Holt.
Kennedy, David. (1990). Hans-Georg Gadamer’s Dialectic of Dialogue and the Epistemology of the Community of Inquiry. Analytic Teaching, 11(1). http://journal.viterbo.edu/index.php/at/article/view/529.
Kennedy, David. (1997). The Five Communities. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 16(4), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews19971647.
Kennedy, David. (2004). The Role of a Facilitator in a Community of Philosophical Inquiry. Metaphilosophy 35(5), p. 744–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2004.00348.x.
Kennedy, David. (2010). Philosophical Dialogue with Children: Essays on Theory and Practice. New York: Edwin Mellen Press.
Laverty, Megan J. (2016). Philosophy for Children and Listening Education: An Ear for Thinking. In Leonard J. Waks. Listening to Teach: Beyond Didactic Pedagogy (p. 53–68). New York: SUNY Press.
Lewin, David. (2014). Behold: Silence and Attention in Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 48(3), 355–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12074.
Lipman, Matthew. (1995). Caring as Thinking. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines. February 1, 1995. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews199515128.
Lipman, Matthew. (2003). Thinking in Education. London: Cambridge University Press.
McCall, Catherine C. & Weijers, Ed. (2016). Back to Basics: A Philosophical Analysis of Philosophy With Children. In Maughn Rollins Gregory, Karin Murris, and Joanna Haynes (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children (p. 84–92). London: Routledge.
Miles, Siân. (2005). Introduction. In Siân Miles (Ed.), Simone Weil: An Anthology, by Simone Weil (p. 1–68). Modern Classics. London: Penguin.
Murdoch, Iris. (1999a). Against Dryness. In Peter Conradi (Ed.), Existentialists and Mystics : Writings on Philosophy and Literature (p. 287–95). London: Penguin.
Murdoch, Iris. (1999b). The Idea of Perfection. In Peter Conradi (Ed.), Existentialists and Mystics: Writings on Philosophy and Literature (299–336). London: Penguin.
Murdoch, Iris. (1999c). “The Sublime and the Good.” In Peter Conradi (Ed.), Existentialists and Mystics, Wirtings on Philosophy and Literature (205–34). London: Penguin.
Murdoch, Iris. 2014. The Sovereignty of Good. London: Routledge. (Original work published in 1970).
Murris, Karin Saskia. (2008). Philosophy with Children, the Stingray and the Educative Value of Disequilibrium. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(3–4), 667–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00640.x.
Panizza, Silvia Caprioglio. (2022a). Attention. In Silvia Caprioglio Panizza & Mark Hopwood (Eds.), The Murdochian Mind, (p. 156–68). Routledge Philosophical Minds. London: Routledge.
Panizza, Silvia Caprioglio. (2022b). The Ethics of Attention: Engaging the Real with Iris Murdoch and Simone Weil. London: Taylor & Francis.
Sharp, Ann M. (1987). What Is a ‘Community of Inquiry’?, Journal of Moral Education, 16(1), 37–45.
Sharp, Ann Margaret. (1996). Self-Transformation in the Community of Inquiry. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 16(1), 36–47.
Sharp, Ann Margaret. (1997). The Aesthetic Dimension of the Community of Inquiry. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 17(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews199717122.
Sharp, Ann Margaret. (2004). The Other Dimension of Caring Thinking. C&CT, 12(1), 9–15.
Sharp, Ann Margaret. (2007). The Classroom Community of Inquiry as Ritual. Critical and Creative Thinking, 15(1), 3–14.
Splitter, Laurance J., & Sharp, Ann M. (1995). Teaching for Better Thinking: The Classroom Community of Inquiry. Australian Council for Educational Research, Ltd.
Stanley, Sara, & Lyle, Sue. (2016). Philosophical Play in the Early Years Classroom. In Maughn Rollins Gregory, Karin Murris, and Joanna Haynes (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children (p. 53–62). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726625-18.
Thomas, Christopher. (2020). Simone Weil: The Ethics of Affliction and the Aesthetics of Attention. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 28(2), 145–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2020.1736127.
Watzl, Sebastian. (2023). What Attention Is. The Priority Structure Account. WIREs Cognitive Science, 14(1). e1632. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1632.
Weber, Barbara, & Wolf, Arthur. (2016). Questioning the Question: A Hermeneutical Perspective on the ‘Art of Questioning’ in a Community of Philosophical Inquiry. In Maughn Rollins Gregory, Karin Murris, and Joanna Haynes (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children (74–82). London: Routledge.
Weil, Simone. (1999). Draft for a Statement of Human Obligations. In Siân Miles (Ed.), Simone Weil : An Anthology,(p. 221–30). Modern Classics. London: Penguin.
Weil, Simone. (2002). Gravity and Grace. 1st edition. London ; New York: Routledge.
Weil, Simone. (2009a). Forms of the Implicit Love of God. In Waiting for God (translated by Craufurd Emma, p. 137–215). Perennial Modern Classics. London ; New York: Harper and Row.
Weil, Simone. (2009b). Reflections on the Right Use of School Studies with a View to the Love of God. In Waiting for God (Translated by Crauford Emma). London ; New York: Harper and Row.
Weil, Simone. (2014). Letter to a Priest (Translated by A F Willis). London: Routledge.
White, Boyd. (1998). Aesthetigrams: Mapping Aesthetic Experiences. Studies in Art Education, 39(4), 321–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.1998.11650035.
Yoon, Haeny S., & Templeton, Tran Nguyen. (2019). The Practice of Listening to Children: The Challenges of Hearing Children Out in an Adult-Regulated World. Harvard Educational Review, 89(1), 55-84, 173.
Zaretsky, Robert. (2023). The Subversive Simone Weil: A Life in Five Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
