Rights of Nature as a counter-hegemonic paradigm
The tactical use of Law in legal litigation and the Cherán case
Keywords:
Cherán Case, Rights of Nature, Counter-hegemonic litigation, Tactical use of LawAbstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze how the rights of Nature currently constitute a counter-hegemonic paradigm, based on a critical conception of Law, which can be used in the field of litigation. As occurred with the indigenous population of Cherán (Mexico), which used legal recourse to obtain recognition of its autonomy and thus the management of environmental spaces. Adopting the deductive method and the bibliographic research, as well as the case study, this research is divided into three sections. Initially, it delves into the theory of the rights of Nature as a counter-hegemonic paradigm; subsequently, it focuses on Law’s essence and its political use from a Marxist perspective, and finally, it analyzes the hypothesis of this political use in counter-hegemonic litigation based on the study of the Cherán case.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Leura Dalla Riva, Mayra Angélica Rodriguez Avalos (Autor/a)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors the sole responsibility for their texts.
It is allowed the total or partial reproduction of the articles of the Journal Law and Praxis, if the author is mentioned.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License.
This license allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial, provided the original authorship is cited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.