Professionalism, gender, and inequality
An inquiry into the causes of gender disparity in Brazilian courts
Keywords:
Gender inequality, Gendered closure mechanisms, Judiciary, Professionalism, Causal hypothesesAbstract
https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2023/69049
This article discusses the causes behind the patent gender inequality in Brazilian Courts.
Based on the seminal work of Maria da Glória Bonelli, it updates data on gender
composition of the São Paulo Court of Justice (TJSP) and the Federal Regional Court of the
3rd Region (TRF3). State and federal courts' data evolution is then compared, and Bonelli's
previous thesis to explain the findings is discussed. Showing evidence of increasing gender
inequality at the federal level and only a small progress at the state level, the article argues
this new data contradicts her "professionalism" centered thesis. In addition, two
hypotheses are discussed to explain the phenomenon: (i) a greater Executive branch
interference in the Federal Justice; and (ii) the effect of subtle legal-related mechanisms
both at the entry and the intermediate career levels.
Keywords: Gender inequality; Gendered closure mechanisms; Judiciary; Professionalism;
Causal hypotheses.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Direito e Práxis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors the sole responsibility for their texts.
It is allowed the total or partial reproduction of the articles of the Journal Law and Praxis, if the author is mentioned.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License.
This license allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial, provided the original authorship is cited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.