BOA-FÉ PROCESSUAL E ABUSO DO DIREITO DE AÇÃO: O ASSÉDIO PROCESSUAL DEFINIDO PELO SUPERIOR TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA E OUTRAS MODALIDADES ESTRANGEIRAS DE ILÍCITO PROCESSUAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2025.91581Abstract
The current Code of Civil Procedure, by idealizing a procedural model based on the principle of procedural cooperation (art. 6) and the scope of expand the fundamental guarantee of the adversary system (arts. 7 and 9) – including as a guarantee of no surprise (art. 10) – enshrines procedural good faith as one of the fundamental norms of Brazilian civil procedure (art. 5), whose observance is mandatory for all those who in any way participate in the process. Based on this premise, this article aims to analyze different types of protection of procedural good faith, based on the prohibition of abusive behavior regarding the exercise of the right of action. To this end, procedural harassment was examined, an expression coined by the Superior Tribunal de Justiça to portray the procedural wrongdoing consisting in the successive filing of lawsuits without reputable grounds and attempting malicious intent. Then, the following situations of protection of procedural good faith regulated in foreign legal systems were analyzed: a) prohibition of sham litigation; b) prohibition of frivolous litigation; c) prohibition of vexatious litigation; d) prohibition of splitting of causes of action and flood or bury in documents; e) strategic lawsuit against public participation and chilling effect; f) guerrilla tactics in international arbitration. In the end, it was concluded that it is necessary to continue seeking to identify abusive procedural conducts, with the aim of structuring a Brazilian legal system to contain procedural wrongdoings involving the various forms of protection of procedural good faith and impediment to the abusive exercise of right of action.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marcelo Veiga Franco, Guilherme Costa Leroy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todos os artigos publicados na Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual (REDP) (Departamento de Direito Processual, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) são licenciados por meio de uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
Os autores retêm os direitos autorais de seu artigo e concordam em licenciar seu trabalho com a licença CC BY 4.0, aceitando assim os termos e condições específicos desta licença disponíveis no seguinte website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
- Os autores concedem à REDP o direito de primeira publicação, de se identificar como publicadora original do trabalho e concedem à revista uma licença de direitos não exclusivos para utilizar o trabalho das seguintes formas: Reproduzir, vender e distribuir cópias eletrônicas ou impressas do manuscrito como um todo, de partes específicas do manuscrito e de suas traduções para qualquer idioma;
- O uso do artigo por terceiros é livre, contanto que a integridade da publicação seja mantida e seus autores originais, periódico de primeira publicação e detalhes de citação sejam identificados.
Dentro dos termos da licença, os autores podem entrar em acordos contratuais adicionais separados para a distribuição não exclusiva da versão publicada do trabalho na revista.
Copyright and Licensing
All articles published in the Procedural Law Electronic Review (REDP) (Department of Procedural Law, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) are licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors retain copyright to their article and agree to license their work under the CC BY 4.0 license, thereby accepting the specific terms and conditions of this license available at the following website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ legal code.
- Authors grant REDP the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher of the work, and grant the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: Reproduce, sell and distribute electronic or printed copies of the manuscript as a whole, of specific parts of the manuscript and its translations into any language;
- Use of the article by third parties is free, as long as the integrity of the publication is maintained and its original authors, first publication journal, and citation details are identified.
Within the terms of the license, authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in the journal.