Interview with Rafael Rubio, Full Professor of Constitutional Law at the Complutense University of Madrid
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/publicum.2025.100009Keywords:
disinformation, digital democracy, electoral law, platform regulation, freedom of expression, political participationAbstract
In this issue, the Teachers' Room section features an interview with Rafael Rubio, Full Professor of Constitutional Law at the Complutense University of Madrid and a leading international scholar on disinformation, technology, and democracy. The conversation, led by Jane Reis Gonçalves Pereira (Associate Professor of Constitutional Law at the State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Federal Judge, and editor-in-chief of Revista Publicum) and Patrícia Perrone Campos Mello (Professor of Constitutional Law at the University Center of Brasília (UniCEUB), Attorney for the State of Rio de Janeiro, and law clerk to a Justice of the Brazilian Supreme Court), ranges widely: Rubio looks back on his academic path and the shifting nature of electoral disinformation, draws comparisons between the European and Latin American experiences, takes stock of the EU's regulatory framework and the role of digital platforms, and weighs in on the friction between digital participation and representative institutions, the proper limits of judicial intervention when legislatures fail to act, and the push for transparency in campaign financing. He closes with a candid take on Brazil's response to disinformation in the 2022 elections—one that is critical yet, on balance, favorable.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rafael Rubio, Jane Reis Gonçalves Pereira, Patricia Perrone Campos Mello

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The author(s) of the paper declare(s) to know and agree to the following rules:
1) The author(s) undertook the work presented to the journal, being entirely responsible for the ideas and concepts therein transmitted, which do not necessarily correspond to the point of view of Publicum’s Editors.
2) The ethical principles alluded to in the evaluation policy of the journal [RDN1] were met in the conduction of the work presented to submission.
3) The author(s) assume(s) authorship and responsibility for their work, declaring that it does not infringe any third party intellectual property rights.
4) The author(s) take(s) full responsibility for moral or patrimonial damages that the distribution of the work may generate to third parties.
5) The author(s) grant(s) the journal the rights to reproduce, edit and first publish the paper in any media – in particular in digital form – in an electronic archive on the Internet.
6) The author(s) confer(s) the right to the editors to modify the text submitted, without prejudice of its contents, when necessary to standardize the presentation of the works and to meet the norms of the journals’ own edition.
7) The author(s) agree(s) to the final form of the paper approved by the journal.
8) The author(s) authorize(s) the disclosure of the paper in the channels of communication of the Faculty of Law of UERJ.
9) The author(s) agree(s) with the reproduction of short extracts from the paper in other UERJ publications.
10) The author(s) recognize(s) that, through the abovementioned assignment and authorizations, he/she/they will not receive payment under any modality, meaning these will have the nature of scientific collaboration.
11) The author(s) is(are) aware that publication of the work may be refused if it is not considered appropriate, for any reason, whatsoever, and such refusal does not create responsibility and/or burdens of any kind to the journal or UERJ.
[RDN1]Ver COPE.

Publicum está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
