SETTLER FRAGILITY: Four Paradoxes of Decolonizing Research

Kaitlyn Watson, Sandra Jeppesen

Resumo


This dialogic autoethnography, in which the authors reflect on their experiences as settlers who have researched with Indigenous communities, maps four paradoxes settler researchers need to negotiate in decolonizing research. The term settler fragility signals a settler positioning of innocence in colonization, which simultaneously recenters colonial power to secure settler futures. In research, settler fragility must be confronted through four paradoxes: (1) the paradox of learning Indigenous worldviews in a profound way but without appropriation; (2) the paradox of unsettling research by undoing colonial epistemologies in which settlers problematically aim to feel settled; (3) the paradox of reconciling research to improve relationships with Indigenous communities which can lead to reconciling settlers with their place in colonialism, rather than with Indigenous research partners; and (4) the paradox of decolonizing research in which settler research in colonial universities is recognized as incommensurate with decolonization and yet must be undertaken to decolonize the university. Contributing a tentative set of settler research practices, this paper aims to expand dialogues about how settlers can overcome settler fragility through negotiating the four paradoxes of decolonizing research to develop authentic relationships with Indigenous communities, researchers, and research partners.


Palavras-chave


decolonizing methodologies, reconciliation, systemic anti-Indigenous racism, dialogic autoethnography, settler research

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


ABSOLON, K; WILLET, C. Putting Ourselves Forward: Location in Aboriginal Research. In: BROWN, L & STREGA, S. (ed.). Research as Resistance. Toronto: Canadian Scholars, 2005. 303p. p. 97-126.

AHMED, S. Declarations of Whiteness: The non-performativity of anti-racism. Borderlands, v. 3, n. 2. 2004.

ANTOINE, A. ; MASON, R. ; MASON, R. et al. Pulling Together: A Guide for Curriculum Developers, 2018. Available at: https://opentextbc.ca/indigenizationcurriculumdevelopers/. Accessed on: Aug. 19 2020.

ARCHIBALD, J. Creating an Indigenous Intellectual Movement at Canadian Universities. In: VALASKAKIS, G. G.; STOUT, M. D.; & GUIMOND, E. (ed.). Restoring the Balance: First Nations Women, Community, and Culture. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, 2008. 384p. p. 125-148.

AVATAR. Directed by James Cameron. United States of America: Twentieth Century Fox, Dune Entertainment, Lightstorm Entertainment, 2009. (162 min), son., colour. Fiction.

BATTISTE, M. Micmac literacy and cognitive assimilation. In: BARMAN, J.; HÉBERT, Y.; MCCASKILL, D. (ed.). Indian Education in Canada, V1: The Legacy. Vancouver: UBC Press, 1986. 180p. p. 23-45.

BILGE, S. Intersectionality Undone: Saving Intersectionality from Feminist Intersectionality Studies. Du Bois Review, v. 10, n. 2, p. 405-424. 2014.

BRANT CASTELLANO, M. Ethics of Aboriginal Research. Journal of Aboriginal Health, v. 1, n. 1, p. 98-114. 2004.

BRE. Hard Livin’: Bare Life, Autoethnography, and the Homeless Body. In: SHUKAITIS, S.; GRAEBER, D. (ed.). Constituent Imagination. Oakland: AK Press, 2007. 329p. p. 223-241

BUTZ, D.; BESIO, K. Autoethnography. Geography Compass, v. 3, n. 5, p. 1660-1674. 2009.

CHASE, S. Chapter 25: Narrative inquiry. In: DENZIN, N.; LINCOLN, Y. (ed.). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 4. ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2011. 766p. p. 421-434.

CHRISJOHN, R.; WASACASE, T. Half-truths and whole lies: Rhetoric in the “apology” and the truth and reconciliation commission. In: YOUNGING, G.; DEWAR, J.; DEGAGNÉ, M. (ed.). Response, responsibility, and renewal: Canada’s truth and reconciliation journey. Ottawa: Aboriginal Healing, 2009. 422p.

CLARK, N. Red intersectionality and violence-informed witnessing praxis with Indigenous girls. Girlhood Studies, v. 9, n. 2, p. 46-64. 2016.

CONNELLY, M.; CLANDININ, J. Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, v. 19, n. 5, p. 577-590. 1990.

COTERA, M. Women of Color, Tenure, and the Neoliberal University. In: NOCELLA, A. J.; BEST, S.; MCLAREN, P. (ed.). Academic Repression. Oakland: AK Press, 2010. 590p. p. 328-336.

DANCES WITH WOLVES. Directed by Kevin Costner. United States of America and United Kingdom: Tig Productions (presents), Majestic Films International, and Allied Filmmakers, 1990. (181 min), son., colour. Fiction.

DAVIS, L. Risky stories: Speaking and writing in colonial spaces. Native Studies Review, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1-20. 2004.

DECOSTA, R.; CLARK, T. Exploring non-Aboriginal attitudes towards reconciliation in Canada: The beginnings of targeted focus group research. In: MATHUR, A.; DEWAR, J.; DEGAGNE, M. (ed.). Cultivating Canada: Reconciliation through the Lens of Cultural Diversity. Ottawa: Aboriginal Healing, 2011. 463p. p. 327-339.

DENZIN, N.; LINCOLN, Y. Introduction: Critical Methodologies and Indigenous inquiry. In: DENZIN, N.; LINCOLN, Y.; SMITH, L. T. (ed.). Handbook of critical and Indigenous methodologies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2008. 624p. p. 1-20.

DHAMOON, R. A Feminist Approach to Decolonizing Anti-Racism: Rethinking Transnationalism, Intersectionality, and Settler Colonialism. Feral Feminisms, v. 4. p. 20-37. 2015.

DE SOUZA SANTOS, B. Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. New York: Routledge, 2014. 284p.

DIANGELO, R. White Fragility: Why It's So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism. Boston: Beacon, 2018. 192p.

ERMINE, W. The ethical space of engagement. Indigenous Law Journal, v. 6, n. 1, p. 193-203. 2007.

FELLOWS, M. L.; RAZACK, S. The Race to Innocence: Confronting Hierarchical Relations Among Women. Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, v. 1, p. 335-352. 1998.

FIRST NATIONS INFORMATION GOVERNANCE CENTRE. The First Nations Principles of OCAP, 1998. Available at: https://fnigc.ca/ocap. Accessed on: Apr. 16 2020.

FORTIER, C. Unsettling Methodologies/Decolonizing Movements. Journal of Indigenous Social Development, v. 6, n. 1, p. 20-36. 2017.

GARBA, T.; SORENTINO, S. M. Slavery is a Metaphor: A Critical Commentary on Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang’s “Decolonization is Not a Metaphor.” Antipode, v. 52, n. 3, p. 764-782. 2020.

GILIO-WHITAKER, D. Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack of Settler Privilege. Beacon Broadside, 2018a. Available at: https://www.beaconbroadside.com/broadside/2018/11/unpacking-the-invisible-knapsack-of-settler-privilege.html. Accessed on: June 1 2020.

_______. Settler Fragility: Why Settler Privilege is So Hard to Talk About. Beacon Broadside, 2018b. Available at: https://www.beaconbroadside.com/broadside/2018/11/settler-fragility-why-settler-privilege-is-so-hard-to-talk-about.html. Accessed on: June 1 2020

HAIG-BROWN, C. Indigenous Thought, Appropriation, and Non‐Aboriginal People. Canadian Journal of Education, v. 33, n. 4, p. 925-950. 2010.

HELD, M. Decolonizing research paradigms in the context of settler colonialism. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, v. 18, n. 1, p. 1-16. 2019.

HENRY, F. et al. The Equity Myth: Racialization and Indigeneity at Canadian Universities. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2017. 392p.

HOUSTON, J. Indigenous Autoethnography: Formulating Our Knowledge, Our Way. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, v. 36, n. 1, p. 45-50. 2007.

JEPPESEN, S. Critical Reflections on Horizontal Media Activism Research Practices. In: JEPPESEN, S; SARTORETTO, P (Eds.). Media Activist Research Ethics. London: Palgrave, 2020. 277p. p. 27-50.

JUSTICE, D. H. Settlers With Opinions. The Conversation, 2017. Available at: https://theconversation.com/settlers-with-opinions-83338. Accessed on: June 1 2020.

KIRKNESS, V.; BARNHARDT, R. First Nations and Higher Education: The Four Rs: Respect, Relevance, Reciprocity, Responsibility. The Journal of American Indian Education, v. 30, n. 3, p. 1-15. 1991.

KOVACH, M. Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations and contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009. 216p.

LADNER, K. Proceed with caution: Reflections on resurgence and reconciliation. In: ASCH, M.; BORROWS, J.; TULLY, J. (ed.). Resurgence and Reconciliation: Indigenous-Settler Relations and Earth Teachings. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018. 384p. p. 245-264.

LOWMAN, E.; BARKER, A. Settler identity and colonialism in 21st century Canada. Halifax: Fernwood, 2015. 158p.

MCIVOR, O. I Am My Subject: Blending Indigenous Research Methodology and Autoethnography Through Integrity-based, Spirit-based Research. Canadian Journal of Native Education, v.33, n.1, p. 137-155. 2010.

MCKENZIE-SUTTER, H. Poetry book on missing, murdered Indigenous women pulled following criticism from victim’s family. The Globe and Mail, 2018. Available at: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books/article-poetry-book-on-missing-murdered-indigenous-women-pulled-following/. Accessed on: July 12 2018.

MILLOY, J. A National Crime: The Canadian Government and the Residential School System. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, 1999. 424p.

MOSBY, I. Administering Colonial Science: Nutrition Research and Human Biomedical Experimentation in Aboriginal Communities and Residential Schools, 1942-1952. Social History, v. 46, n. 91, p. 145-172. 2013.

NATIONAL INQUIRY. Reclaiming Power and Place: The Final Report of the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls (Vol. 1a). 2019. Available at: https://www.mmiwg-ffada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Final_Report_Vol_1a-1.pdf. Accessed on: Apr. 15 2020.

PIAPOT, N. Book about Gerald Stanley case upsets Colten Boushie’s family due to lack of consultation. CBC, 2019. Available at: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/boushie-family-triggered-by-roach-book-1.5026486. Accessed on: Aug. 20 2020.

REGAN, P. Unsettling the Settler Within: Indian Residential Schools, Truth Telling, and Reconciliation in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2010. 316p.

RIESSMAN, C. Narrative methods for the human sciences. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2007. 251p.

ROACH, K. Canadian Justice, Indigenous Injustice: The Gerald Stanley and Colten Boushie Case. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2019.

SHAND, P. Can copyright be reconciled with First Nations’ interests in visual arts? Protecting Knowledge: Traditional Resource Rights in the New Millennium conference, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 2000. p. 1-26. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20080609172204/http://www.ubcic.bc.ca/files/PDF/shand.pdf. Accessed on: Sept, 20 2020.

SMITH, L. T. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples, 2. ed. London: Zed, 2012. 242p.

STYRES, S. Pathways for Remembering and Recognizing Indigenous Thought in Education: Philosophies of Iethi’nihsténha Ohwentsia’kékha (Land). Toronto: University of Toronto Press, Scholarly Publishing Division, 2017. 248p.

THE LAST OF THE MOHICANS. Directed by Michael Mann. United States of America: Morgan Creek Entertainment and Twentieth Century Fox, 1992. (112 min), son., colour. Fiction.

TRC. Honouring the Truth, Reconciling the Future: Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, 2015. Available at: http://www.trc.ca/assets/pdf/Honouring_the_Truth_Reconciling_for_the_Future_July_23_2015.pdf. Accessed on: Aug. 12 2020.

TUCK, E.; YANG, W. Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-40. 2012.

WATSON, K. Understanding Indigenous and non-Indigenous Perspectives of Reconciliation. 257p. PhD Dissertation, Faculty of Education, Western University, 2020.

WEBB-CAMPBELL, S. Who Took My Sister?. Toronto: BookThug, 2018.

WHITINUI, P. Indigenous Autoethnography: Exploring, Engaging, and Experiencing “Self” as a Native Method of Inquiry. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, v. 43, n. 4, p. 456-487. 2014.

WILSON, S. Research is Ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Halifax: Fernwood, 2008. 144p.

WOOLFORD, A. The limits of justice: certainty, affirmative repair, and aboriginality. Journal of Human Rights, v. 3, n. 4, p. 429-444. 2004.

YURCHUK, Y.; VORONOVA, L. Challenges of Ongoing Conflict Research: Dialogic Autoethnography in Studies of Post-2014 Ukraine. In: JEPPESEN, S.; SARTORETTO, P. (ed.). Media Activist Research Ethics. London: Palgrave, 2020. 276p. p. 249-268.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.12957/rcd.2020.55392

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


e-ISSN: 2674-9246