O Jus post bellum (justiça após a guerra) nas Relações Internacionais Contemporâneas: Entre a Teoria e a Narrativa

Rodrigo Augusto Duarte Amaral

Resumo


Tradicionalmente, a Teoria da Guerra Justa (TGJ) é concebida por dois conceitos fundamentais sobre conflitos: razões justas para iniciá-lo (jus ad bellum); e formas justas para lutá-lo (jus in bello). Recentemente outro conceito emergiu, sobre as formas justas para se terminar um conflito e a transição para um contexto de paz (jus post bellum - JPB), que analisaremos. Neste artigo pretendemos: a) apresentar os princípios normativos do JPB; b) demonstrar sua aplicabilidade nos cenários pós-conflitos, conforme a literatura liberal humanitária; c) criticar algumas premissas apresentadas por seus teóricos. Desde 1990, intensifica-se uma agenda humanitária de operações de paz e ajuda a Estados não-liberais, sobretudo via ONU. Assim, diversos pesquisadores buscam compreender os limites morais dos atores internacionais no pós-conflito. Então, perguntamos: o JPB surge para auxiliar uma agenda de responsabilidade dos Estados “vencedores” sob os “derrotados”, ou seria funcional corroborando a uma agenda intervencionista das potências internacionais, supostamente benéfica?

Palavras-chave


Jus Post Bellum; Intervencionismo Liberal; Perspectivas crítica

Texto completo:

PDF

Referências


BASS, Garry, 2004. Jus Post Bellum. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 32, 384-412.

BELL, Christine, 2008. On the Law of Peace: Peace Agreements and the Lex Pacificatoria. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

BELLAMY, Alex J, 2009. Guerras Justas: de Cicerón a Iraq. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

______. 2008. The responsibilities of victory: Jus Post Bellum and the Just War. Review of International Studies. 34, 601–625.

BOON, Kristen, 2014. The Aplication of Jus Post Bellum in Non-International Armed Conflicts. In: STAHN, C.; EASTERDAY, J S.; IVERSON, J. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 259-268.

CHANDLER, David, 2004. The Responsibility to Protect? Imposing the ‘Liberal Peace’. International Peacekeeping, 11, 59–81.

CHAYES, Antonia, 2013. Chapter VII½: Is Jus Post Bellum Possible? The European Journal of International Law. 24, 291-305

DE BRABANDERE, Eric. 2010. The Responsibility for Post- Conflict Reforms: A Critical Assessment of Jus Post Bellum as a Legal Concept. Vanderbilt journal of Transnational Law. 43, 120-149.

______, 2014. The Concept of Jus Post Bellum in International Law: A Normative Critique. In: STAHN, C.; EASTERDAY, J S.; IVERSON, J. Jus Post Bellum. Mapping the Normative Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 123-142.

EASTERDAY, Jennifer S.; IVERSON, Jens; STAHN, 2014. Exploring the Normative Foundations of Jus Post Bellum: An Introduction. In: STAHN, C.; EASTERDAY, J S.; IVERSON, J. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-10.

FASSIN, Didier, 2012. Humanitarian Reason: A Moral History of the Present. Translated by Rachel Gomme. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London. University of California Press.

FLECK. Dieter, 2014. Jus Post Bellum as a Partly Independent Legal Framework. In: STAHN, C.; EASTERDAY, J S.; IVERSON, J. Jus Post Belllum: Mapping the Normative Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 43-58

FOX, G. H, 2014. Navigating the Unilateral/Multilateral Divide. In: STAHN, C.; EASTERDAY, J S.; IVERSON, J. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 229-256.

LAZAR, Seth, 2012. Skepticism about Jus Post Bellum. in: MAY, Larry. Morality, jus post bellum, and international law. New York: Cambridge University Press, 204-223.

LEWKOWICZ, Gregory. 2011, Jus Post Bellum: Vieille, Antienne ou Nouvelle Branche du Droit ? Sur le Mythe de L’origine Vénérable du Jus Post Bellum, Revue Belge de Droit International/Belgian Review of International Law. 1, 1-16.

MAY, Larry, 2012. After war ends: a philosophical perspective. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

______, 2014. Jus Post Bellum, Grotius, and Meionexia In: STAHN, C.; EASTERDAY, J. S.; IVERSON, J. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 15-26.

OREND, Brian, 2000. Jus Post Bellum, Journal of Social Philosophy. 31, 117–137.

______, 2012. Justice After War: Toward a New Geneva Convention, in: PATTERSON, Eric. Ethics beyond war’s end, Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, 175-197

ÖSTERDAHL, Inger; ZADEL, Esther van, 2009. What Will Jus Post Bellum Mean? Of New Wine and Old Bottles. Journal of Conflict & Security Law. 14, 175–207

PARIS, Roland, 2004. At War’s End Building Peace After Civil Conflict. Cambridge; New York; Cambridge University Press.

RICHMOND, Oliver, 2008. Peace in International Relations. New York ; Rutledge.

SARI, Aurel., 2014. The Status of Foreign Armed Forces Deployed in Post-Conflict Environments: A Search for Basic Principles. In: STAHN, C.; EASTERDAY, J S.; IVERSON, J. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 467-502.

STAHN, Carsten, 2006. ‘Jus ad bellum’, ‘jus in bello’ . . . ‘jus post bellum’? Rethinking the Conception of the Law of Armed Force. The European Journal of International Law. 17, 921-943.

______, 2014. R2P and Jus Post Bellum: Towards a Polycentric Approach In: STAHN, C.; EASTERDAY, J S.; IVERSON, J. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 102-123

VATANPARAST, Roxana, 2014. Waging Peace: Ambiguities, Contradictions, and Problems of a Jus Post Bellum Legal Framework. In: STAHN, C.; EASTERDAY, J S.; IVERSON, J. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 142-160.

WALDRON, Jeremy, 2002. Post Bellum Aspects of the Laws of Armed Conflict Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 31, 31-55.

WALZER, Michael 2004. Arguing About War. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.

ZAUM, Dominik, 2014 Jus Post Bellum and the Politics of Exit. In: STAHN, C.; EASTERDAY, J S.; IVERSON, J. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 334-344.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.12957/neiba.2016.27883

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Direitos autorais

Indexada em | Indexed by:

Academia.edu

ISSN: 2317-3459 (Qualis B1)

PPGRI - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Relações Internacionais

Rua São Francisco Xavier, 524, Pavilhão - João Lyra Filho, 9ºandar, Bloco F, sala 9037, Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Cep: 20550-013 - Tel. fax: (021) 2334 0678 /// E.mail – uerjneiba@gmail.com