CARD SORTING FOR REMOTE RESEARCH
IDENTIFYING USEFUL DATA AND NEW LEARNINGS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/arcosdesign.2025.82958Palabras clave:
UX, Card sorting, usability, information architectureResumen
This paper presents proceedings and structure to conduct card sorting as part of research strategies, based on studies from Padovani, Tullis & Wood, Maurer & Warfel and Preece. The research proposes how to adapt card sorting appropriately to remote research working scenarios of the post-pandemic new century. This analytical study is based on two different information architecture structure research projects – an online learning search engine to help people find courses within enormous possibilities of learning subjects, and a co-living system, where people with similar interests gather and share living for communal learning experiences. Although the analysis is based on 2 real projects, this paper focuses mainly on card sorting procedures itself, without sharing too much information about the projects. The 2 projects helped to compare processes and results of representative user profiles and non-representative profiles to better understand the pain points, the advantages and disadvantages and the triggers to identify misleading information when conducting card sorting.
Descargas
Citas
CYBIS, W.; BETIO, A. H.; Fau ST, R.: Ergonomia e usabilidade: conhecimentos, métodos e aplicações. São Paulo: Novatec Editora, 2007.
GOLDSTEIN, L.; FAIED, M.; MCHARG, S. Open-source information architecture design: using the tools you have to conduct card sorting and tree testing. Digital.gov. <https://digital.gov/2022/01/06/open-source-information-architecture-design-using-the-tools-you-have-to-conduct-card-sorting-and-tree-testing/>
GUIMARÃES, M; ZISMAN, R.; RENZI, A.B.: Pharmaceutical Online Store Project: Usability, Affordances and Expectations. In: Advances in Human Factors and Systems Interaction, Proceedings of the AHFE 2019 International Conference on Human Factors and Systems Interaction, July 24-28, Washington D.C., USA. (2019).
KUNIAVSKY, M.: Observing the user experience. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003).
MAURER, D. What is usability. Step two design KMC columns. Australia (2004).
MAURER, D.; WARFEL, T.: Card sorting: a definitive guide. Disponível online em: http://cuttingedgecourse.com/CIS360/CardSortingGuide.pdf (2004).
OPTIMALWORKSHOP. Online card sorting: the comprehensive guide. <https://www.optimalworkshop.com/blog/online-card-sorting-the-comprehensive-guide>
PADOVANI, S.; RIBEIRO, M. A.: Card sorting: adaptação da técnica para aplicação ao design de sistemas de informação não digitais. v. 10 | n. 3, p. 293 – 312, São Paulo (2013).
RENZI, A.B.; AGNER, L. Prioritization matrix to highlight business opportunities. In: Marcus, A., Rosenzweig, E., Soares, M.M. (eds) Design, User Experience, and Usability. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14030. Springer, Cham.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35699-5_4
RENZI, A. B.; MEIRA, C.; RIBEIRO, A.C.; CORREIA, M.; BITTENCOURT, M.; SOUZA, J.; LANNA, K.: User experience journey with multiple devices and telepresence during quarantine. In: Revista Ergodesign,p. 80-95. Rio de Janeiro (2020).
RENZI, A.B.; FREITAS, S. Delphi method for future scenario construction. In: Procedia Manufacturing, Volume 3, 2015, Pages 5785-5791, ISSN 2351-9789, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.826.
SANDE, A., RENZI, A.B., SCHNAIDER, S.: Experience, Usability and Sense of Things. In: Design, User Experience, and Usability: Designing Pleasurable Experiences. DUXU 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10289. Springer, p.77-86. Vancouver (2017).
SANTA ROSA, G.; MORAES, A. de.: Design Participativo. Rio Books, Rio de Janeiro (2012).
SHERWIN, K. Remote card sorting. NN group website <https://www.nngroup.com/videos/remote-card-sorting/>
SPENCER, D. Card Sorting: Designing Usable Categories. Rosenfeld Media. New York, (2009).
SPENCER, D. What is Card Sorting? Interaction Design Foundation website <https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/card-sorting#card-sorting-faqs>
TEIXEIRA, E., MORAES, A de.: Avaliação cooperativa da interface de sites hipermídias focados na “banda larga”. In: Congresso Internacional de Ergonomia e Usabilidade, Design de Interfaces e Interação Humano-Computador, 3., Rio de Janeiro (2004).
TULLIS, T.; WOOD, L. How Many Users Are Enough for a Card-Sorting Study?. In: Usability professionals associations (UPA) 2004 conference. Mineapolis, MN (2004).
UNGER, R.; CHANDLER, C. A project guide to UX Design. New Riders, 2nd ed. Berkley, (2012).
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Adriano Renzi
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Os Direitos Autorais dos artigos publicados na revista Arcos Design pertencem ao(s) seu(s) respectivo(s) autor(es), com os direitos de Primeira Publicação cedidos à Arcos Design, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, a qual permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista. Para mais informações ver: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- O(s) autor(es) tem/têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de
autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista. - Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais, menções nas redes sociais ou na sua página pessoal) após a publicação na revista visando ampliar a visibilidade, o impacto e a a citação do trabalho publicado.
