Clássicos, marxistas e marginalistas: uma análise econômico-jurídica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/publicum.2017.28981Abstract
O presente artigo objetiva realizar uma análise envolvendo dois planos distintos do pensamento econômico: o entendimento clássico-marxista (Adam Smith, David Ricardo e Karl Marx) e a escola marginalista (principalmente Carl Menger, William Jevons e Léon Walras). Serão defrontados esses pensamentos no tocante a análise econômica voltada para a sociedade, a possibilidade de seu direcionamento para o benefício social e preservação dos direitos essenciais. De outro lado, ainda serão estudados esses pensamentos quando relacionam as características do capitalismo, com o primeiro grupo criticando uma estrutura de exploração, e o segundo enervando o modelo como ajustado à justiça social. Tomando conhecimento das estruturas de cada ramo do entendimento econômico, é que se pode pensar o atual sistema político-econômico em sua validade, um sistema cujo implemento foi, é, e sempre será alvo de discussões.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author(s) of the paper declare(s) to know and agree to the following rules:
1) The author(s) undertook the work presented to the journal, being entirely responsible for the ideas and concepts therein transmitted, which do not necessarily correspond to the point of view of Publicum’s Editors.
2) The ethical principles alluded to in the evaluation policy of the journal [RDN1] were met in the conduction of the work presented to submission.
3) The author(s) assume(s) authorship and responsibility for their work, declaring that it does not infringe any third party intellectual property rights.
4) The author(s) take(s) full responsibility for moral or patrimonial damages that the distribution of the work may generate to third parties.
5) The author(s) grant(s) the journal the rights to reproduce, edit and first publish the paper in any media – in particular in digital form – in an electronic archive on the Internet.
6) The author(s) confer(s) the right to the editors to modify the text submitted, without prejudice of its contents, when necessary to standardize the presentation of the works and to meet the norms of the journals’ own edition.
7) The author(s) agree(s) to the final form of the paper approved by the journal.
8) The author(s) authorize(s) the disclosure of the paper in the channels of communication of the Faculty of Law of UERJ.
9) The author(s) agree(s) with the reproduction of short extracts from the paper in other UERJ publications.
10) The author(s) recognize(s) that, through the abovementioned assignment and authorizations, he/she/they will not receive payment under any modality, meaning these will have the nature of scientific collaboration.
11) The author(s) is(are) aware that publication of the work may be refused if it is not considered appropriate, for any reason, whatsoever, and such refusal does not create responsibility and/or burdens of any kind to the journal or UERJ.
[RDN1]Ver COPE.
Publicum está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
