Small claims class actions: a comparative analysis of the brazilian and american systems from the perspective of positive externalities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/publicum.2016.19914Keywords:
Class Actions, Economic analysis of law, Positive externalities, Class Actions for Damages, Small claimsAbstract
To enable the effective private enforcement of liability rules sometimes the policy makers have to interfere, creating mechanisms to allow people do litigate claims that, otherwise, would not be taken to the courts. One of the procedural solutions to this problem are the small claims class actions. In this paper, we adopt the view that deterrence should be the focus of these policies, once the compensation is too low to even motivate injured people to pursue it. Some legal systems are more equipped to induce deterrence through class litigation of small claims and to generate other positive externalities, increasing the social welfare. Here we aim to compare the Brazilian and the American system, and to verify in what extent both class action systems are able to generate social benefits. And because it is possible to identify that deterrence is not the primary focus of Brazilian legal scenario in this topic, we intend to propose some legislative changes to put this feature and other positive externalities in the center of the debate, where it belongs.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author(s) of the paper declare(s) to know and agree to the following rules:
1) The author(s) undertook the work presented to the journal, being entirely responsible for the ideas and concepts therein transmitted, which do not necessarily correspond to the point of view of Publicum’s Editors.
2) The ethical principles alluded to in the evaluation policy of the journal [RDN1] were met in the conduction of the work presented to submission.
3) The author(s) assume(s) authorship and responsibility for their work, declaring that it does not infringe any third party intellectual property rights.
4) The author(s) take(s) full responsibility for moral or patrimonial damages that the distribution of the work may generate to third parties.
5) The author(s) grant(s) the journal the rights to reproduce, edit and first publish the paper in any media – in particular in digital form – in an electronic archive on the Internet.
6) The author(s) confer(s) the right to the editors to modify the text submitted, without prejudice of its contents, when necessary to standardize the presentation of the works and to meet the norms of the journals’ own edition.
7) The author(s) agree(s) to the final form of the paper approved by the journal.
8) The author(s) authorize(s) the disclosure of the paper in the channels of communication of the Faculty of Law of UERJ.
9) The author(s) agree(s) with the reproduction of short extracts from the paper in other UERJ publications.
10) The author(s) recognize(s) that, through the abovementioned assignment and authorizations, he/she/they will not receive payment under any modality, meaning these will have the nature of scientific collaboration.
11) The author(s) is(are) aware that publication of the work may be refused if it is not considered appropriate, for any reason, whatsoever, and such refusal does not create responsibility and/or burdens of any kind to the journal or UERJ.
[RDN1]Ver COPE.
Publicum está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.