The bad and the intolerable in minority cultures practices: reflections in light of Will Kymlicka’s thought
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/publicum.2015.19879Keywords:
Multiculturalism, Internal Minorities, Autonomy, Intolerability, Fundamental rights conflictsAbstract
The article's objective is to formulate normative standards about the protection of internal minorities, understood as those that pertain, but do not fit in cultural groups that are minorities within a State. In order to achieve that, initially, the main aspects of the multiculturalism debate are presented. The theoretical framework adopted is Will Kymlicka's, called liberal culturalism. Afterwards, as a necessary premise to the construction of the normative standards about the protection of internal minorities, the article proceeds to an investigation about which is liberalism's core value – whether tolerance, or autonomy. Each perspective leads to different normative outcomes in respect to what situations legitimize a liberal State to intervene in a minority group so as to protect individual rights. After reaching the conclusion that autonomy is liberalism's core value, five standards are suggested aimed at providing a way to identify which situations of fundamental rights of internal minorities violation are serious enough to be classified as intolerable, making an intervention feasible. Finally, the standards are applied to a case.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author(s) of the paper declare(s) to know and agree to the following rules:
1) The author(s) undertook the work presented to the journal, being entirely responsible for the ideas and concepts therein transmitted, which do not necessarily correspond to the point of view of Publicum’s Editors.
2) The ethical principles alluded to in the evaluation policy of the journal [RDN1] were met in the conduction of the work presented to submission.
3) The author(s) assume(s) authorship and responsibility for their work, declaring that it does not infringe any third party intellectual property rights.
4) The author(s) take(s) full responsibility for moral or patrimonial damages that the distribution of the work may generate to third parties.
5) The author(s) grant(s) the journal the rights to reproduce, edit and first publish the paper in any media – in particular in digital form – in an electronic archive on the Internet.
6) The author(s) confer(s) the right to the editors to modify the text submitted, without prejudice of its contents, when necessary to standardize the presentation of the works and to meet the norms of the journals’ own edition.
7) The author(s) agree(s) to the final form of the paper approved by the journal.
8) The author(s) authorize(s) the disclosure of the paper in the channels of communication of the Faculty of Law of UERJ.
9) The author(s) agree(s) with the reproduction of short extracts from the paper in other UERJ publications.
10) The author(s) recognize(s) that, through the abovementioned assignment and authorizations, he/she/they will not receive payment under any modality, meaning these will have the nature of scientific collaboration.
11) The author(s) is(are) aware that publication of the work may be refused if it is not considered appropriate, for any reason, whatsoever, and such refusal does not create responsibility and/or burdens of any kind to the journal or UERJ.
[RDN1]Ver COPE.
Publicum está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.