Efeitos da adoção de alternativas à prisão provisória
uma revisão de literatura
Keywords:
Prisão provisória, Audiência de custódia, Reincidência, Inclusão social, Bem-estar psicossocialAbstract
Pessoas presas provisoriamente, sem condenação, representam 27,2% da população prisional do Brasil. Dado o contexto de superlotação e de violação de direitos nas prisões, objetivou-se identificar os potenciais efeitos da adoção de medidas alternativas à prisão provisória para os desfechos de reincidência criminal e bem-estar psicossocial entre adultos e idosos. Foi realizada uma revisão rápida que identificou 34 revisões sistemáticas sobre o tema, as quais reportaram 09 intervenções. A qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas foi mista, avaliada pela ferramenta AMSTAR 2. Para o desfecho de reincidência, foram consideradas efetivas as intervenções de dissuasão focada, justiça restaurativa, supervisão da liberdade provisória, Centros de Notificação Diurna, terapia cognitivo-comportamental, mentoria para jovens, tribunais específicos para crimes relacionados a drogas, tribunais específicos para casos de saúde mental que realizam encaminhamento para tratamento, manejo de caso e oferta de programas sociais, aconselhamento breve (exceto quando ocorre no contexto da detenção), intervenções motivacionais para homens que cometeram violência contra mulheres, programas de liberdade provisória específicos para violência doméstica e tratamentos para pessoas que cometeram violência sexual. Poucos estudos reportaram desfechos de bem-estar psicossocial, o que indica uma lacuna na produção científica. Estudos primários e secundários mais rigorosos sobre o tema são necessários, bem como pesquisas realizadas no contexto brasileiro.
References
Abt, T., & Winship, C. (2016). What works in reducing community violence: a meta-review and field study for the Northern Triangle. USAID: Bethesda.
Alemohammad, S.M. (2017). Exploring the effectiveness of evidence-based methods to measure and improve offenders' engagement in treatment. Nottingham: The University of Nottingham.
Bakrania, S. (2015). Security and justice evidence mapping. Birmingham: GSDRC.
Bechtel, K., Holsinger, A. M., Lowenkamp, C. T., & Warren, M. J. (2016). A Meta-Analytic Review of Pretrial Research: Risk Assessment, Bond Type, and Interventions. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(2), 443–467. doi:10.1007/s12103-016-9367-1
Berghuis, M. (2018). Reentry Programs for Adult Male Offender Recidivism and Reintegration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 0306624X1877844. doi:10.1177/0306624x18778448.
Braga, A. A., & Weisburd, D. L. (2012). The Effects of “Pulling Levers” Focused Deterrence Strategies on Crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–90.
Braga, A. A., Weisburd, D., & Turchan, B. (2019). Focused deterrence strategies effects on crime: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15(3). doi:10.1002/cl2.1051
Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice (CCPCJ). (2018). World crime trends and emerging issues and responses in the field of crime prevention and criminal justice. Viena: ECOSOC.
Conselho Nacional de Justiça. (2015). Resolução nº 213, de 15 de dezembro de 2015. Dispõe sobre a apresentação de toda pessoa presa à autoridade judicial no prazo de 24 horas.
Dennis, J. A., Khan, O., Ferriter, M., Huband, N., Powney, M. J., & Duggan, C. (2012). Psychological interventions for adults who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007507.pub
Haby, M. M., Chapman, E., Clark, R., Barreto, J., Reveiz, L., & Lavis, J. N. (2016). What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review. Health Research Policy and Systems, 14(1). doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0155-7
Hockenhull, J. C., Whittington, R., Leitner, M., Barr, W., McGuire, J., Cherry, M. G., Flentje, R., Quinn, B., Dundar, Y., & Dickson, R. (2012). A systematic review of prevention and intervention strategies for populations at high risk of engaging in violent behaviour: update 2002-8. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 16(3), 1–152. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta16030
Langlois, E. V., Straus, S. E., Antony, J., King, V. J., & Tricco, A. C. (2019). Using rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems and progress towards universal health coverage. BMJ Global Health, 4(1), e001178. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001178
Liu, P., Nunn, R., & Shambaugh, J. (2018). The Economics of Bail and Pretrial Detention. Washington: Brookings.
Loong, D., Bonato, S., Barnsley, J., & Dewa, C. S. (2019). The Effectiveness of Mental Health Courts in Reducing Recidivism and Police Contact: A Systematic Review. Community Mental Health Journal, 55, 1073–1098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-019-00421-9
Lowder, E. M., Rade, C. B., & Desmarais, S. L. (2018). Effectiveness of Mental Health Courts in Reducing Recidivism: A Meta-Analysis. Psychiatric Services, 69(1), 15–22. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201700107
Lowenkamp, C.T.; Vannostrand, M., & Holsinger, A. (2013). Investigating the Impact of Pretrial Detention on Sentencing Outcomes. Washington: LJAF.
Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013a). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: a systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(3), 245–274. doi:10.1007/s11292-013-9175-2
Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013b). Legitimacy in Policing: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 9(1). doi:10.4073/csr.2013.1 .
Mazerolle, L., Eggins, E., Sydes, M., Hine, L., McEwan, J., Norrie, G., & Somerville, A. (2018). Criminal justice responses to domestic and family violence: a rapid review of the literature. Brisbane, QLD, Australia: The University of Queensland.
Mitchell, O., Wilson, D. B., Eggers, A., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2012). Drug Courts’ Effects on Criminal Offending for Juveniles and Adults. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8(1). doi:10.4073/csr.2012.4
Murray, J., Wickramasekera, N., Elings, M., Bragg, R., Brennan, C., Richardson, Z., Elsey, H. (2019). The impact of care farms on quality of life, depression and anxiety among different population groups: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15(4). doi:10.1002/cl2.1061
Nesset, M. B., Lara-Cabrera, M. L., Dalsbø, T. K., Pedersen, S. A., Bjørngaard, J. H., & Palmstierna, T. (2019). Cognitive behavioural group therapy for male perpetrators of intimate partner violence: a systematic review. BMC psychiatry, 19(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2010-1
Newbury-Birch, D., McGovern, R., Birch, J., O'Neill, G., Kaner, H., Sondhi, A., & Lynch, K. (2016). A rapid systematic review of what we know about alcohol use disorders and brief interventions in the criminal justice system. International journal of prisoner health, 12(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-08-2015-0024
Perry, A. E., Martyn-St James, M., Burns, L., Hewitt, C., Glanville, J. M., Aboaja,, & A., Wright, K. (2019). Interventions for female drug-using offenders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010910.pub3
Schmucker, M., & Lösel, F. (2015). The effects of sexual offender treatment on recidivism: an international meta-analysis of sound quality evaluations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(4), 597–630. doi:10.1007/s11292-015-9241-z
Schmucker, M., & Lösel, F. (2017). Sexual offender treatment for reducing recidivism among convicted sex offenders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 13(1), 1–75. doi:10.4073/csr.2017.8
Sevigny, E. L., Fuleihan, B. K., & Ferdik, F. V. (2013). Do drug courts reduce the use of incarceration?: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(6), 416–425. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.06.005
Shaffer, D. K. (2011). Looking Inside the Black Box of Drug Courts: A Meta‐Analytic Review. Justice Quarterly, 28(3), 493–521. doi:10.1080/07418825.2010.525222
Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., … Henry, D. A. (2017). AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ, j4008. doi:10.1136/bmj.j4008
Smith, A., Heyes, K., Fox, C., Harrison, J., Kiss, Z., & Bradbury, A. (2018). The effectiveness of probation supervision towards reducing reoffending. Probation Journal, 026455051879627. doi:10.1177/0264550518796275
Strang, H., Sherman, L. W., Mayo‐Wilson, E., Woods, D., & Ariel, B. (2013). Restorative Justice Conferencing (RJC) Using Face‐to‐Face Meetings of Offenders and Victims: Effects on Offender Recidivism and Victim Satisfaction. A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 9(1), 1–59. doi:10.4073/csr.2013.12
Talbot, E. C., Völlm, B., & Khalifa, N. (2015). Effectiveness of work skills programmes for offenders with mental disorders: A systematic review. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 27(1), 40–58. doi:10.1002/cbm.1981
Thomas, J., Newman, M., & Oliver, S. (2013). Rapid evidence assessments of research to inform social policy: taking stock and moving forward. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 9(1), 5–27. doi:10.1332/174426413x662572
Tolan, P., Henry, D., Schoeny, M., Bass, A., Lovegrove, P., & Nichols, E. (2013). Mentoring Interventions to Affect Juvenile Delinquency and Associated Problems: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 9(1), 1–158. doi:10.4073/csr.2013.10
Vigurs, C., Schucan-Bird, K., Quy, K., & Gough, D. (2015). A systematic review of motivational approaches as a pre-treatment intervention for domestic violence perpetrator programmes. London: EPPI-Centre.
Vigurs, C., Schucan-Bird, K., Quy, K., & Gough, D. (2016). The impact of domestic violence perpetrator programmes on victim and criminal justice outcomes: A systematic review of reviews of research evidence. London: EPPI-Centre.
Viljoen, J. L., Jonnson, M. R., Cochrane, D. M., Vargen, L. M., & Vincent, G. M. (2019). Impact of risk assessment instruments on rates of pretrial detention, postconviction placements, and release: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Law and human behavior, 43(5), 397–420. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000344
Villettaz, P., Gillieron, G., & Killias, M. (2015). The Effects on Re‐offending of Custodial vs. Non‐custodial Sanctions: An Updated Systematic Review of the State of Knowledge. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 11 (1), 1–92.
White, H. (2017). The effects of sentencing policy on re-offending: A summary of evidence from 12 Campbell systematic reviews. Oslo: Campbell Collaboration.
Wilson, D. B., Feder, L., & Olaghere, A. (2021). Court‐mandated interventions for individuals convicted of domestic violence: An updated Campbell systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(1). doi:10.1002/cl2.1151
Wong,J. S., Bouchard, J., Lee, C., & Gushue, K. (2019). Examining the effects of day reporting centers on recidivism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 58 (3), 240-260. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2019.1583300
Woodhouse, R., Neilson, M., Martyn-St James, M., Glanville, J., Hewitt, C., & Perry, A. E. (2016). Interventions for drug-using offenders with co-occurring mental health problems: a systematic review and economic appraisal. Health & justice, 4(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-016-0041-y
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I declare that the text has not been published and was submitted exclusively to that Journal for publication. I stress that all the ethical procedures demanded in law were respected.
I declare to agree with the cession of the author rights of the article to the journal Psychology and Social Knowing, with its total or partial reproduction in print, magnetic or electronic means being forbidden, without previous written authorization by the Scientific Editor of the Journal.