Medida de Objetificação de Mulheres

Adaptação e Evidências de Validade

Autores

  • Arima de Andrade Santana
  • Kaline da Silva Lima
  • Marcus Eugênio Oliveira Lima
  • Francisca Ádila dos Santos

Resumo

A objetificação refere-se à experiência de ser tratada apenas como um corpo-instrumento. O presente artigo objetivou validar a Escala de Objetificação de Mulheres (EOM). O primeiro estudo consistiu na adaptação dos itens e validade de conteúdo, mediante um processo de tradução, concordância entre especialistas sobre adequação, clareza e relevância. O segundo estudo contou com uma amostra de 253 homens heterossexuais de 18 a 67 anos de idade (M = 36,06; DP = 11,62) que responderam a EOM e escalas de sexismo ambivalente e racismo. Os resultados demonstraram evidências de validade da estrutura interna: CFI = 0,98, TLI = 0,98, SRMR = 0,06 e RMSEA = 0,03, e consistência interna (α = 0,78). Os escores de objetificação correlacionaram-se moderadamente com o sexismo ambivalente e racismo, demonstrando validação convergente-discriminante. Tais resultados indicam a validade da medida no contexto brasileiro, possibilitando seu uso em estudos futuros.

Referências

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Akrami, N., Ekehammar, B., & Yang-Wallentin, F. (2011). Personality and social psychology factors explaining sexism. Journal of Individual differences, 32(3), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000043

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (U.S.). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. AERA.

Bergh, R., & Brandt, M. J. (2022). Generalized Prejudice: Lessons about social power, ideological conflict, and levels of abstraction. European Review of Social Psychology, 34(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2022.2040140

Bohner, G., Ahlborn, K., & Steiner, R. (2009). How Sexy are Sexist Men? Women’s Perception of Male Response Profiles in the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory. Sex Roles, 62(7-8), 568-582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9665-x

Borgogna, N. C., McDermott, R. C., Berry, A. T., & Browning, B. R. (2019). Masculinity and problematic pornography viewing: The moderating role of self-esteem. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 21(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000214

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press.

Carlsson, F., Kataria, M., & Lampi, E. (2022). Sexual objectification of women in media and the gender wage gap: Does exposure to objectifying pictures lower the reservation wage?. https://hdl.handle.net/2077/73317

Chen, S., Van Tilburg, W. A., & Leman, P. J. (2022). Self‐objectification in women predicts approval motivation in online self‐presentation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(1), 366-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12485

Curran, P. (2004). Development of a New Measure of Men’s Objectification of Women: Factor Structure Test Retest Validity. Honors Projects. https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/psych_honproj/13

DiStefano, C., & Morgan, G. B. (2014). A Comparison of Diagonal Weighted Least Squares Robust Estimation Techniques for Ordinal Data. A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(3), 425-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915373

Felig, R. N., Jordan, J. A., Shepard, S. L., Courtney, E. P., Goldenberg, J. L., & Roberts, T. A. (2022). When looking ‘hot’means not feeling cold: Evidence that self‐objectification inhibits feelings of being cold. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(2), 455-470. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12489

Fileborn, B. (2018). Naming the Unspeakable Harm of Street Harassment: A Survey-Based Examination of Disclosure Practices. Violence against Women, 25(2), 223-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218768709

Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2013). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. John Wiley & Sons.

Formiga, N. S., Golveia, V. V., & Santos, M. N. (2002). Inventário de sexismo ambivalente: sua adaptação e relação com o gênero. Psicologia em Estudo, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-73722002000100013

Franco, S., Vieira, C. M., & Oliveira, M. R. M. D. (2022). Objectification of woman: gender implications in the imminence of bariatric surgery. Revista Estudos Feministas, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2022v30n379438

Frederick, D. A., Tylka, T. L., Rodgers, R. F., Pennesi, J. L., Convertino, L., Parent, M. C., Brown, T. A., Compte, E. J., Cook-Cottone, C. P., Crerand, C. E., Malcarne, V. L., Nagata, J. M., Perez, M., Pila, E., Shaefer, L. M., Thompson, J. K., & Murray, S. B. (2022). Pathways from sociocultural and objectification constructs to body satisfaction among women: The US Body Project I. Body Image, 41(1), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.02.001

Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification Theory: Toward Understanding Women’s Lived Experiences and Mental Health Risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x

Gervasio, A. H., & Ruckdeschel, K. (1992). College Students’ Judgments of Verbal Sexual Harassment1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(3), 190-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb01535.x

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491

Gothreau, C. M., Alvarez, A. M., & Friesen, A. (2022). Objectified and Dehumanized: Does Objectification Impact Perceptions of Women Political Candidates? Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2022.15

Heflick, N. A., Goldenberg, J. L., Cooper, D. P., & Puvia, E. (2011). From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(3), 572-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.020

Holland, E., Koval, P., Stratemeyer, M., Thomson, F., & Haslam, N. (2016). Sexual objectification in women’s daily lives: A smartphone ecological momentary assessment study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(2), 314-333. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12152

Jiao, J., Terán, L., & Aubrey, J. S. (2022). Buffering an objectifying culture: Interpersonal sexual objectification, self-objectification, and attachment anxiety. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 46(4), 438-453. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843221115335

Kellie, D. J., Blake, K. R., & Brooks, R. C. (2019). What drives female objectification? An investigation of appearance-based interpersonal perceptions and the objectification of women. Plos One, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221388

Koval, P., Holland, E., Zyphur, M. J., Stratemeyer, M., Knight, J. M., Bailen, N. H., Thompson, R. J., Roberts, T.A., & Haslam, N. (2019). How does it feel to be treated like an object? Direct and indirect effects of exposure to sexual objectification on women’s emotions in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(6), 885-898. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000161

Lima, M. E. O, Barbosa, I. H.A., Araujo, E. M. S., & Almeida, J. N. (2020). Construção e validação da Escala de Racismo Revitimizador. Estudos Interdisciplinares Em Psicologia, 11(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.5433/2236-6407.2020v11n2p130

Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 377-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x

Moradi, B., & Tebbe, E. (2022). Um teste da teoria da objetificação com mulheres de minorias sexuais. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 46(2), 226-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211052525

Quinn, B. A. (2002). Sexual Harassment and Masculinity: The Power and Meaning of “Girl Watching”. Gender and Society, 16(3), 386-402. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3081785

Riemer, A. R., Sáez, G., Brock, R. L., & Gervais, S. J. (2022). The development and psychometric evaluation of the Objectification Perpetration Scale. Journal of counseling psychology, 69(4), 541. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000607

Riemer, A., Chaudoir, S., & Earnshaw, V. (2014). What Looks Like Sexism and Why? The Effect of Comment Type and Perpetrator Type on Women’s Perceptions of Sexism. The Journal of General Psychology, 141(3), 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2014.907769

Roberts, T. A., Calogero, R. M., & Gervais, S. J. (2018). Objectification theory: Continuing contributions to feminist psychology. APA Handbook of the Psychology of Women: History, Theory, and Battlegrounds, 1, 249-271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000059-013

Roca, G. M. (2018). Through the Lens of Objectification Theory: Social Media Use and Women’s Behavioral Health al Health (pp. 1–103) [USF Tampa Graduate Theses and Dissertations]. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/7707

Singh, D., & Young, R. K. (1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(6), 483-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(95)00074-7

Szymanski, D. M., Carr, E. R., & Moffitt, L. B. (2011). Sexual objectification of women: Clinical implications and training considerations. The Counseling Psychologist, 39(1), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000010378450

Wanniarachchi, V. U., Scogings, C., Susnjak, T., & Mathrani, A. (2022). Fat stigma and body objectification: A text analysis approach using social media content. Digital Health, 8, 205520762211174. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221117404

Ward, L. M., Daniels, E. A., Zurbriggen, E. L., & Rosenscruggs, D. (2023). The sources and consequences of sexual objectification. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00192-x

Zolot, L. (2003). The Development of a Measure of Men’s Objectification of Women. Honors Projects. http://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/psych_honproj/29

Downloads

Publicado

01.01.2021

Como Citar

Santana, A. de A., Lima, K. da S., Lima, M. E. O., & Santos, F. Ádila dos. (2021). Medida de Objetificação de Mulheres: Adaptação e Evidências de Validade. Psicologia E Saber Social, 10(1), 16–42. Recuperado de https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/psi-sabersocial/article/view/83385

Edição

v. 10 n. 1 (2021): JAN-JUN

Seção

Artigos

Licença

Declaro que o texto é inédito e foi submetido exclusivamente a essa Revista para fins de publicação. Ressalto que foram respeitados todos os procedimentos éticos exigidos em lei.

Declaro concordar com a cessão dos direitos autorais do artigo à Revista Psicologia e Saber Social, estando vedada sua reprodução, total ou parcial, em meio impresso, magnético ou eletrônico, sem autorização prévia por escrito do Editor Científico da Revista.