Ideology, Elections, and Brazil's International Engagement | Ideologia, Eleições e o Engajamento Internacional do Brasil

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12957/rmi.2026.101377

Keywords:

Brazilian Foreign Policy, Ideology, Elections, Presidential Diplomacy

Abstract

This article investigates the effect of ideological convergence between the Brazilian president and foreign counterparts on bilateral diplomatic engagement, as well as the conditioning role of the domestic electoral cycle in this relationship. Using a systemic GMM model with panel data for 110 countries between 1998 and 2020, and the Foreign Policy Index (FPI) as the dependent variable, the results indicate that ideological convergence alone does not produce a significant effect on bilateral engagement. However, during electoral years, ideological affinity becomes a vector of distancing: ideological allies suffer a reduction of approximately 1.7% in the FPI. The effect is more pronounced in reelection years (-2.1%) than in presidential transition years (-1.4%). The findings suggest that, in contexts of domestic political competition, the Brazilian government tends to neglect ideologically aligned partners, possibly because they are considered more complacent and, therefore, less priority in terms of diplomatic attention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Pedro Feliú Ribeiro, Universidade de São Paulo

Doutor em Ciência Política pela USP

References

Bailey, M. A.; Strezhnev, A.; Voeten, E. (2017) ‘Estimating Dynamic State Preferences from United Nations Voting Data’. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(2), pp. 430–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002715595700.

Baracaldo Orjuela, D. e Chenou, J. M. (2019) ‘Regionalism and Presidential Ideology in the Current Wave of Latin American Integration.’ International Area Studies Review, 22(1), pp. 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865918815008.

Burges, S. W. e Chagas Bastos, F. H. (2017) ‘The Importance of Presidential Leadership for Brazilian Foreign Policy.’ Policy Studies, 38(3), pp. 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1290224

Casarões, G. S. P. e Farias, D. B. L. (2022) ‘Brazilian Foreign Policy under Jair Bolsonaro: Far-Right Populism and the Rejection of the Liberal International Order.’ Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 35(5), pp. 741–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2022.2051370

Cason, J. W. e Power, T. J. (2009) ‘Presidentialization, pluralization, and the rollback of Itamaraty: explaining change in Brazilian foreign policy making in the Cardoso-Lula era.’ International Political Science Review, 30(2), pp. 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512109102432

Cervo, A. L. e Lessa, A. C. (2014) ‘O declínio: inserção internacional do Brasil (2011–2014).’ Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 57(2), pp. 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201400308.

Danese, S. F. (2017) Diplomacia presidencial: história e crítica. 2. ed. Brasília: Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão.

Feliu Ribeiro, P.; Ferreira, T. e Sposito, I. (2025) ‘Measuring Brazilian Foreign Policy Engagement: composition and validation of the Foreign Policy Index’. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional. 68(2), pp. DOI: 10.1590/0034-7329202500115.

Guimarães, F. e Silva, I. (2021) ‘Far-right populism and foreign policy identity: Jair Bolsonaro's ultra-conservatism and the new politics of alignment.’ International Affairs, 97(2), pp. 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa220.

Herre, B. (2023) ‘Identifying Ideologues: A Global Dataset on Political Leaders, 1945–2020’. British Journal of Political Science, 53(2), pp. 740–748.

Lees, N. (2023) ‘The endurance of the G77 in international relations: South–South ideology and voting at the United Nations 1970–2015’. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 24(3), pp. 310-330.

Merke, F; Reynoso, D. e Schenoni, L. (2020) ‘Foreign policy change in Latin America: exploring a middle-range concept.’ Latin American Research Review, 55(3), pp. 413-429. https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.861.

Neumayer, E. (2008) ‘Distance, power and ideology: diplomatic representation in a world of nation-states’. Area, 40, pp. 228-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00804.x

Rodrigues, P.; Urdinez, F.; Oliveira, A. (2019) ‘Measuring international engagement: systemic and domestic factors in Brazilian foreign policy from 1998 to 2014.’ Foreign Policy Analysis 15(3), pp. 370–391. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orz010.

Saraiva, M. (2010) ‘Brazilian foreign policy towards South America during the Lula administration: caught between South America and Mercosur.’ Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 53, special issue, pp. 151–168.

Tavares, A. A. O.; Burns, S. L. (2025) ‘Presidents and diplomacy: ideology’s impact on Brazil’s international forest engagement’. Third World Quarterly, 46(16), pp. 2098–2120. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2025.2560560.

Vigevani, T. e Cepaluni, G. (2007) ‘Lula’s foreign policy and the quest for autonomy through diversification.’ Third World Quarterly 28(7), pp. 1309–1326.

Published

2026-09-14

How to Cite

RIBEIRO, Pedro Feliú. Ideology, Elections, and Brazil’s International Engagement | Ideologia, Eleições e o Engajamento Internacional do Brasil. Mural Internacional, Rio de Janeiro, v. 17, p. e101377, 2026. DOI: 10.12957/rmi.2026.101377. Disponível em: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/muralinternacional/article/view/101377. Acesso em: 17 sep. 2026.

Issue

Section

SPECIAL CONTRIBUTION