Crises políticas na América Latina: convergências e dissensos entre OEA e Unasul na busca pela democracia | Political crises in Latin America: convergences and disagreements between OAS and Unasur in the search for democracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/rmi.2020.48785Keywords:
Democracia liberal capitalista. Promoção da democracia. América LatinaAbstract
Com o fim da Guerra Fria, a promoção da democracia passou a integrar o cerne da agenda internacional. Na América do Sul, este fenômeno teve contornos bastante peculiares, fruto da polarização política regional vivida nas primeiras décadas do século XXI e da consequente sobreposição de organizações internacionais que lidam com o tema. Nesse contexto, OEA e Unasul se destacaram por sua centralidade, trazendo em suas normas e em suas reações às crises políticas tanto consonâncias quanto contrastes.
Palavras-chave: Promoção da democracia; OEA; Unasul.
ABSTRACT
With the end of the Cold War, the promotion of democracy became an important part of the international agenda. In South America, this phenomenon had very peculiar contours, because of the regional political polarization experienced in the first decades of the 21st century and the consequent overlap of international organizations that deal with the theme. In this context, OAS and Unasur stood out for their centrality, bringing in their norms and their reactions to political crises both consonances and contrasts.
Keywords: Democracy promotion; OAS; Unasur.
Recebido em: 29 fev. 2020 | Aceito em: 17 jul. 2020.
Downloads
References
Aín, G. (2012). Multilateralismo y Resolución de Conflictos en Sudamérica. Tesis de maestría. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Máster de Relaciones Internacionales y Estudios Africanos, Madrid.
Ayerbe, L. (2011). ‘Crise de Hegemonia e Emergência de Novos Atores na Bolívia: O Governo de Evo Morales’. Lua Nova, São Paulo, 83, pp. 179-216.
Bobbio, N. (2000). Liberalismo e Democracia. São Paulo: Brasiliense.
Carothers, T. (2006). “The Backlash Against Democracy Promotion”. Foreign Affairs, 85(2), Mar.- Apr., pp. 55-68.
Coelho, L. (2012). ‘Caso Lugo faz OEA enviar missão ao país’. Folha de São Paulo. 27 jun. Disponível em: http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/mundo/51282-caso-lugo-faz-oea-enviar-missao-ao-pais.shtml. [Acesso em: 02 Fevereiro 2020].
Curiel, J.; Williams, J. (2020). ‘Bolivia dismissed its October elections as fraudulent. Our research found no reason to suspect fraud’. Washington Post, 27 fev. Disponível em: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/02/26/bolivia-dismissed-its-october-elections-fraudulent-our-research-found-no-reason-suspect-fraud/ [Acesso em: 27 Fevereiro 2020].
Doyle, M. (1983). ‘Kant, Liberal legacies and foreign affairs’. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 12(3) Summer, pp. 205-235.
Grimm, S. (2019). ‘Democracy promotion in EU enlargement negotiations: more interaction, less hierarchy’. Democratization. 26(5), pp. 851-868.
Hurrell, A. (2007). On Global Order Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society. New York: Oxford University.
Kersffeld, D. (2013). ‘El papel de la UNASUR ante los conflictos internacionales: dos estudios de caso’. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Nueva Época, Año LVIII, n.218, mayo-agosto, pp. 193-208.
Koskenniemi, M. (1996). “Response: Intolerant Democracies”. Harvard International Law Journals. 37(1), Winter.
Kurki, M. (2010). ‘Democracy and Conceptual Contestability: reconsidering conceptions of democracy in democracy promotion’, International Studies Review, 12(3), pp. 362-386.
Mainwaring, S.; Pérez-Liñan, A. (2005). ‘Latin American Democratization since 1978: Democratic Transitions, Breakdowns, and Erosions’, in: Hagopian, F.; Mainwaring, S. (Ed.). The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University, pp. 14-62.
Pannain, R. (2019). “Expansão do Estado na Bolívia e resistências: entre hegemonias e autonomias”. Mediações, v.24, pp. 22-47.
Paris, R. (1997). ‘Peacebuilding and the Limits of Liberal Internationalism’. International Security, 22(2), (Fall 1997), pp. 54-89.
Robinson, W. (2013). ‘Promoting polyarchy: 20 years later’. International Relations, 27(2), pp. 228-234.
Sartori, G. (1994). A Teoria Democrática Revisitada. São Paulo: Ática.
Schumpeter, J. (2006). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Routledge, [1942].
Schraeder, P. (2003). The State of the Art in International Democracy Promotion: Results of a Joint European-North American Research Network, pp. 21-44.
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. (1995). ‘International Law in a World of Liberal States’. E.J.I.L., pp. 503-538.
Sörensen, J. (2013). ‘Intervention and statebuilding in Kosovo’, in: Chandler, David; Sisk, Timothy (Ed.). Routledge Handbook of International Statebuilding. London: Routledge, pp. 269-280.
Ventura, D. (2016). Como OEA e Unasul veem o impeachment. Disponível em: https://www.nexojornal.com.br/expresso/2016/04/17/Como-OEA-e-Unasul-veem-o-impeachment.-E-qual-o-risco-de-Temer-n%C3%A3o-ser-reconhecido. [Acesso em: 30 Mai. 2020].
Vincent, J. (2005). Human Rights and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Copyrights of articles published in Revista Mural Internacional belong to their respective author (s), with the first publication rights assigned to Mural International, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows sharing the work with an acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. Due to the fact that they appear in Mural Internacional, the articles are free to use, with mandatory attribution of authorship, for use in educational and non-commercial applications, according to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License adopted by this journal.
This work is licensed under a license Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
