A geoeconomia do desenvolvimento chinês: das Quatro Modernizações à Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) | The geoeconomics of Chinese Development: from Four Modernizations to Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/rmi.2020.47480Keywords:
Geoeconomia, Desenvolvimento Econômico, China.Abstract
RESUMO
Após o final da Guerra Fria, muitos analistas passaram a analisar a forma pela qual o sistema internacional se estruturaria. Dentre esses, destaca-se a contribuição de Edward Luttwak que cunhou o termo geoeconomia para ressaltar as tendências do sistema internacional, na qual as rivalidades interestatais seriam crescentemente moldadas por instrumentos comerciais e econômicos. A Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) pode ser analisada como mais um projeto geoeconômico criado para atender as demandas internas da economia chinesa e, ao mesmo tempo, garantir a projeção internacional do país. Trata-se de uma estratégia de inserção internacional recorrente na história chinesa que fundamenta o desenvolvimento econômico a partir de uma leitura sobre os condicionantes da competição geopolítica internacional.
Palavras-Chave: Geoeconomia; Desenvolvimento Econômico; China.
ABSTRACT
After the end of the Cold War, analysts began to analyze how the international system would be structured. These contributions include the Edward Luttwak's, who coined the term geoeconomics to analyze the trends in the international system. Interstate rivalries would be increasingly influenced by commercial and economic instruments. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) can be viewed as another geo-economic project designed to meet the demands of economy as well as to ensure the China’s international projection. It is a strategy of recurrent international insertion in Chinese history, in which economic development is based on the conditions of international geopolitical competition.
Keywords: Geoeconomics; Economic Development; China.
Recebido em: 20 dez. 2019 | Aceito em: 25 mai. 2020.
Downloads
References
Acioly, L.; Alves, M.; Leão, R. (2009). A Internacionalização das Empresas Chinesas. Brasília: Ipea, 24p.
Blackwill, R.; Harris, J. (2016). War by other means: Geoeconomics and Economic Statecraft. London: Harvard University Press, 377p.
Beeson, M. (2018). ‘Geoeconomics with Chinese characteristics: the BRI and China’s evolving grand strategy’. Economic and Political Studies, [s.l.], 6(3), pp. 240-256, 3 jul. Informa UK Limited. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2018.1498988. [Acesso em: 17 Mai. 2020].
Carvalho, M. H. (2016). ‘Evolução política econômica China no período maoísta (1949-1978)’. Excedente, Rio de Janeiro, p.1-32, nov. Disponível em: http://www.excedente.org/artigos/a-evolucao-economica-e-politica-da-china-no-periodo-ma oista-1949-1978/>. [Acesso em: 08 Nov. 2016].
Chang-Sheng, S. (2004). ‘Do Grande Salto para a Frente à Grande Fome: China de 1958-1962’. Diálogos, Maringá, 8(1), pp.107-129, dez.
China (2016). National Development and Reform Commission. The 13th Five-Year Plan. Beijing, Disponível em: http://en.ndrc.gov.cn/newsrelease/201612/P020161207645765233498.pdf
China Policy. (2017). ‘Going Global: between ambition and capacity. between ambition and capacity’. China Policy, Beijing, 3(1), pp.1-12, abr. Disponível em: <https://policycn.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/2017-Chinas-going-global-strategy.pdf>. [Acesso em: 28 Out. 2019].
China’s Belt and Road Initiative in the global trade, investment and finance landscape. In: OECD Business and Finance Outlook. [s.i]: OCDE, 2018. pp. 3-46.
Csurgai, G. (2017). ‘The Increasing Importance of Geoeconomics in Power Rivalries in the Twenty-First Century’. Geopolitics, [s.l.], 23(1), pp.38-46, 27 out. Informa UK Limited. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1359547. [Acesso em: 17 Mai. 2020].
Dikotter, F. (2014). Mao's Great Famine. New York: Walker & Co, 382p.
Djankov, S. (2016) (Ed.). “The rationale behind Belt and Road Initiative”, in: Djankov, Simeon; Miner, Sean. China's Belt and Road Initiative: Motives, Scope and Challenges. [s.i]: Peterson Institute of International Economics. pp. 6-11.
Fukuyama, F. (1992). O fim da história e o último homem. Rio de Janeiro: Rocco.
Gilpin, R. (2004). O Desafio do Capitalismo Global. Rio de Janeiro: Record.
Heilmann, S.; Melton, O. (2013). ‘The Reinvention of Development Planning in China, 1993–2012’. Modern China, [s.l.], 39(6), pp. 580-628, 24 ago. SAGE Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0097700413497551 [Acesso em: 17 Mai. 2020].
Huntington, S. P. (1997). O choque de civilizações e a recomposição da ordem mundial. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva.
Ibanez, P. (2020). ‘Belt and Road Initiative and China-Pakistan Economic Corridor’. Journal of China and International Relations, pp. 23-44.
Kissinger, H. (2012). Diplomacia. São Paulo: Saraiva, 859p.
Lacoste, Y. (2009). ‘Géopolitique, économie et nation’. Revue française de Géoéconomie. n. 50, pp. 39- 44.
Luttwak, E. N. (1990). ‘From Geopolitics to Geoeconomics: logic of conflict, grammar of commerce’. The National Interest, n.20, pp.17-23.
Medeiros, C. A. (1999). ‘Economia política do desenvolvimento recente da China’. Revista de Economia Política, 19(3), pp. 92-112.
Medeiros, C. A. (2008). ‘Notas sobre o desenvolvimento econômico recente na China’. Instituto de Estudos Avançados da Universidade de São Paulo, s/n.
Milaré, L. F. L.; Diegues, A. C. (2014). ‘A industrialização chinesa por meio da tríade autonomia-planejamento-controle’. Leituras de Economia Política, Campinas, 22(1), pp. 69-98, dez.
Naughton, Barry (2007). The Chinese economy: Transitions and growth. MIT press.
YU, Au Loong; LI, Kevin. (2011). ‘Preliminary Report on China’s going Global Strategy: A Labour, Environment, and Hong Kong Perspective’. Globalization Monitor. Hong Kong., p.72.
Radchenko, S. (2010). ’The Sino-Soviet split’. The Cambridge History of The Cold War, [s.l.], pp. 349-372, jan., Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/chol9780521837200.018 [Acesso em: 17 Mai. 2020].
Salidjanova, N. (2011). ‘Going Out: An Overview of China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment’. U.s.-china Economic & Security Review Commission, Washington. Disponível em: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Research/GoingOut.pdf . [Acesso em: 17 Mai. 2020].
Scholvin, S.; Wigell, M. (2018). ‘Power politics by economic means: Geoeconomics as an analytical approach and foreign policy practice’. Comparative Strategy, [s.l.], 37(1), pp. 73-84, jan., Informa UK Limited. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2018.1419729 . [Acesso em: 17 Mai. 2020].
Singh, H. K.; Sahgal, A. (2017). ‘OBOR: China’s Neo-Colonial Great Game. Delhi Policy Group’, New Delhi, 2(5), pp. 1-6, maio. Disponível em: http://www.delhipolicygroup.org/publication/policy-notes/dpg-policy-note-vol-ii-issue-5-ob or-chinas-neo-colonial-great-game.html . [Acesso em: 17 Mai. 2020].
Strange, S. (1970). ‘International Economy and International Relations: a Case of Mutual Neglect’. International Affairs, April, v. 46, pp. 304-315.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Copyrights of articles published in Revista Mural Internacional belong to their respective author (s), with the first publication rights assigned to Mural International, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows sharing the work with an acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal. Due to the fact that they appear in Mural Internacional, the articles are free to use, with mandatory attribution of authorship, for use in educational and non-commercial applications, according to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License adopted by this journal.
This work is licensed under a license Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
