Understanding disagreements

a necessary explanation about the theoretical foundations in the legal-scientific discussion

Authors

Keywords:

Philosophy in Law, Disagreements, Hermeneutics

Abstract

https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2022/69069i

These reflections intend to explore the limits of theoretical criticism and establish a minimum agreement about the theoretical frameworks involved in a discussion. It takes care of something here called Understanding Disagreements. As a general objective, it is proposed to investigate how a theoretical critique should be formulated and what are the limits of this formulation. In terms of the research problem, clarify what is essential for a critique to be considered coherent, as well as what can make it incoherent. The hypothesis: theoretical discussions sometimes despise the very content they aim to examine and lack the rigor that practice demands. As for the “method”, it uses hermeneutical phenomenology. For all these reasons, the reflections presented here are justified as an effort to remove the layers of meanings coagulated by legal dogmatics.

Keywords: Theory of Law; Philosophy in Law; Disagreements; Hermeneutics; Hermeneutic Critique of Law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Vinícius Quarelli, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (Unisinos)

Mestrando em Direito Público pela Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS/RS). Especialista em Direito Constitucional pela Academia Brasileira de Direito Constitucional (ABDConst) e pós-graduando em Teoria do Direito, Dogmática Crítica e Hermenêutica pela mesma instituição. Graduado em Direito pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR). Membro do Dasein (Núcleo de Estudos Hermenêuticos).

Luis Henrique Braga Madalena, Academia Brasileira de Direito Constitucional

Doutor em Teoria e Filosofia do Direito pela Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro – UERJ. Mestre em Direito Público pela Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS/RS). Especialista em Direito Constitucional e Teoria Geral do Direito pela Academia Brasileira de Direito Constitucional. Coordenador da Especialização em Teoria do Direito, Dogmática Crítica e Hermenêutica da Academia Brasileira de Direito Constitucional – ABDConst. Vice-Diretor Financeiro da ABDConst. Advogado.

Lenio Luiz Streck, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (Unisinos)

Doutor em Direito pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) com pósdoutorado pela Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa (FDUL). Professor titular da Universidade do Vale do Rio Sinos (UNISINOS/RS) e da Universidade Estácio de Sá (UNESA/RJ).

Downloads

Published

2023-01-25

How to Cite

Quarelli, V., Madalena, L. H. B., & Streck, L. L. (2023). Understanding disagreements: a necessary explanation about the theoretical foundations in the legal-scientific discussion. Direito E Práxis, 15(2). Retrieved from https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/69069

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 2 (2024): REVISTA DIREITO E PRÁXIS

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Direito e Práxis

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The authors the sole responsibility for their texts. 
It is allowed the total or partial reproduction of the articles of the Journal Law and Praxis, if the author is mentioned.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License.
This license allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial, provided the original authorship is cited.

80x15.png

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.