Sexual Imaginaries and Medical In/Attention: Gynecology as Device for Hetero-Cis-Normalization
Keywords:
gynecology, technology of normalization, compulsory heterosexuality, precarityAbstract
This paper seeks to examine the productive effectiveness and normative violence of
Gynecology, following Foucault’s genealogical method, in terms of a technology of heterocis-normalization that induces a differential distribution of precarity, affecting mainly lesbian (cis or trans), transmasculine, bi, non-binary and pansexual bodies and forms of life. In order to develop this analysis, I will first consider Butler´s developments on compulsive heterosexuality, sex and gender norms and vulnerability as a way of thinking Gynecology as a technic of precarity. Secondly, and following Rohden´s, Cabral´s and Preciado´s thoughts, I will argue that Gynecology operates as a “gender prosthesis” that organizes and discipline bodies through a binary system. Finally, and following Foucault, I will conclude that this implies a paradoxical situation for Gynecology, since its heteronormative matrix produces and induces a systematical inattention and carelessness of LGTB people.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors keep the copyright, and they grant to the magazine the right of publication. The reproduction of the texts published on SEXUALITY, HEALTH AND SOCIETY - A LATIN AMERICAN JOURNAL on other publications, even partially, shall state the first issue on this magazine.
SEXUALITY, HEALTH AND SOCIETY - A LATIN AMERICAN JOURNAL is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.