Influência de regimes e ambiente regulatório sobre o risco sistemático das empresas reguladas de infraestrutura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/rcmccuerj.2024.86344Resumen
O objetivo deste estudo é analisar a associação entre regimes e ambientes regulatórios com o risco sistemático de empresas reguladas de setores de infraestrutura. Para tanto, foram utilizados dados de 2010 a 2021, referentes a 174 empresas de 27 países, os quais foram analisados por meio de regressão múltipla com dados em painel. Pesquisas sobre a relação do risco sistemático com o grau de incentivos à eficiência de regimes de regulação, de favorabilidade à competição do ambiente regulatório e de qualidade regulatória utilizando variáveis transversais multipaíses são escassas. Os achados demonstraram que regimes regulatórios com maior poder de incentivo à eficiência e ambientes com maior qualidade regulatória possuem assosicação negativa com o risco sistemático, enquanto ambientes mais favoráveis à competição demonstram associação positiva. Este trabalho contribui com a literatura demonstrar como o risco regulatório pode afetar o risco sistemático e, por consequênciao, o retorno do capital aplicado em empresas reguladas de diferentes setores e países, auxiliando também investidores na sua tomada de decisão. Além disso, contribui empiricamente com reguladores e formuladores de políticas públicas, demonstrando a relevância do ambiente regulatório no que se refere à competição e qualidade regulatória, bem como dos incentivos à eficiência e a repercussão associada ao risco sistemático. Ao evidenciar fatores que podem afetar o preço dos serviços públicos, este trabalho contribui para melhor compreensão do processo regulatório por parte dos consumidores. Por fim, a pesquisa auxilia preparadores e auditores ao demostrar como a regulação está associada ao nível de risco sistemático assumido pelas empresas, de modo a subsidiar escolhas contábeis nesse cenário.
Citas
ABD RASHID, S.; MASRON, T.; MALIM, N. A.. The effect of corruption on entrepreneurship in the presence of weak regulatory quality: Evidence from developing countries. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, v. 86, p. 101476, 2023.
AGYEMAN, Stephen Duah; LIN, Boqiang. Electricity industry (de) regulation and innovation in negative-emission technologies: how do market liberalization influences climate change mitigation?. Energy, [s. l.], v. 270, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.126863.
AHMIĆ, Azra; ISOVIĆ, Ilma. The impact of regulatory quality on deepens level of financial integration: Evidence from the European Union countries (NMS-10). Economics-Innovative and Economics Research Journal, v. 11, n. 1, p. 127-142, 2023.
ALEXANDER, Ian; ESTACHE, Antonio; OLIVERI, Adele. A few things transport regulators should know about risk and the cost of capital. Utilities Policy, [s. l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 1-13, mar. 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-1787(00)00006-0.
ALEXANDER, Ian; MAYER, Colin; WEEDS, Helen. Regulatory structure and risk and infrastructure firms: an international comparison. Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank, [s. l.], nov. 1999.
ALIZADEH, Ali; FEREIDUNIAN, Alireza; KAMWA, Innocent; MOHSENI-BONAB, Seyed Masoud; LESANI, Hamid. A multi-period regulation methodology for reliability as service quality considering reward-penalty scheme. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, [s. l.], v. 38, n. 2, p. 1440-1451, out. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2022.3215964.
ARBLASTER, Margaret. Regulation in markets facing uncertainty: the case of Australia. Journal of Air Transport Management, [s. l.], v. 67, p. 249-258, mar. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.03.007.
ARNOLD, Jens Matthias; WÖRGÖTTER, Andreas. Structural reforms and the benefits of the enlarged EU internal market: still much to be gained. Applied Economics Letters, v. 18, n. 13, p. 1231-1235, 2011.
ATUL, D. A. R.; AMIRKHALKHALI, Sal. On the Impact of Openness and Regulatory Quality on Saving-Investment Dynamics in Emerging Economies. Applied Econometrics and International Development, v. 11, n. 2, 2011.
BAUMOL, William J.; WILLIG, Robert D. Fixed costs, sunk costs, entry barriers, and sustainability of monopoly. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, [s. l.], v. 96, n. 3, p. 405-431, ago. 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1882680.
BEAVER, William; KETTLER, Paul; SCHOLES, Myron. The association between market-determined and accounting-determined risk measures. The Accounting Review, [s. l.], v. 45, n. 4, p. 654-682, out. 1970. Disponível em: https://www.paulcarlislekettler.net/docs/Beaver_Kettler_Scholes.pdf.
BINDER, John J.; NORTON, Seth W. Regulation, profit variability and beta. Journal of Regulatory Economics, [s. l.], v. 15, n. 3, p. 249-266, maio 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008078230272. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5155975_Regulation_Profit_Variability_and_Beta.
BIRD, Ron; LIEM, Harry; THORP, Susan. Infrastructure: real assets and real returns. European Financial Management, [s. l.], v. 20, n. 4, p. 802-824, maio 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2012.00650.x.
BRASIL. Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica. Superintendência de Regulação Econômica e Estudos do Mercado. Taxa Regulatória de Remuneração do Capital: Relatório de Análise de Impacto Regulatório nº 3/2018 – SRM/ANEEL. Brasília: ANEEL, 2018.
BRIMBLE, Mark; HODGSON, Allan. Assessing the risk relevance of accounting variables in diverse economic conditions. Managerial Finance, [s. l.], v. 33, n. 8, p. 553-573, jul. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350710760296.
BUCKLAND, Roger; WILLIAMS, Julian; BEECHER, Janice. Risk and regulation in water utilities: a cross-country comparison of evidence from the CAPM. Journal of Regulatory Economics, [s. l.], v. 47, n. 2, p. 117-145, abr. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-014-9261-z.
BUTLER, Michael R.; MCNERTNEY, Edward M. Election returns as a signal of changing regulatory climate. Energy Economics, [s. l.], v. 13, n. 1, p. 48-54, jan. 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-9883(91)90055-5.
CABRERA JUNIOR, Enrique; ESTRUCH-JUAN, Elvira; GÓMEZ, Elena; DEL TESO, Roberto. Comprehensive regulation of water services. why quality of service and economic costs cannot be considered separately. Water Resources Management, [s. l.], v. 36, n. 3, p. 3247-3264, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03198-x.
CEBULA, Richard J.; MIXON JR, Franklin G. The roles of economic freedom and regulatory quality in creating a favorable environment for investment in energy R & D, infrastructure, and capacity. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, v. 73, n. 2, p. 299-324, 2014.
CEBULA, Richard J.; CLARK, J. R. The effects of economic freedom, regulatory quality and taxation on the level of per capita real income: a preliminary analysis for OECD nations and non-G8 OECD nations. Applied Economics, v. 46, n. 31, p. 3836-3848, 2014.
COLLAN, Mikael; SAVOLAINEN, Jyrki; LILJA, Emma. Analyzing the returns and rate of return regulation of Finnish electricity distribution system operators 2015-2019. Energy Policy, [s. l.], v. 160, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112677.
CONWAY, Paul; HERD, Richard. How competitive is product market regulation in India?: an international and cross-state comparison. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, [s. l.], p. 1-25, 2009. ISSN: 1995-2848. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227461334_How_competitive_is_product_market_regulation_in_India_An_international_and_cross-state_comparison Acesso em: 10 mar. 2024.
COUNCIL OF EUROPEAN ENERGY REGULATORS (CEER). Report on Regulatory Frameworks for European Energy Networks 2020: incentive regulation and benchmarking work stream. Bruxelas, 19 jan. 2023.
DAMODARAN, Aswath. Damodaran on valuation: security analysis for investment and corporate finance. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1994. 464 p. ISBN-10: 0471014508. ISBN-13: 978-0471014508.
DONALDSON, Dave. Railroads of the Raj: Estimating the impact of transportation infrastructure. American Economic Review, v. 108, n. 4-5, p. 899-934, 2018.
ÉGERT, Balázs. Public policy reforms and their impact on productivity, investment and employment: new evidence from OECD and non-OECD countries. Public Sector Economics, [s. l.], v. 46, n. 2, p. 179-205, jun. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3326/pse.46.2.1.
FREEMAN, Robert N. The association between accounting earnings and security returns for large and small firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, [s. l.], v. 9, n. 2, p. 195-228, jul. 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(87)90005-X.
GAGGERO, A. A. Regulation and risk: a cross-country survey of regulated companies. Bulletin of Economic Research, [s. l.], v. 64, n. 2, p. 226-238, abr. 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8586.2010.00360.x.
GAGGERO, Alberto A. Regulatory risk in the utilities industry: an empirical study of the English-speaking countries. Utilities Policy, [s. l.], v. 15, n. 3, p. 191-205, set. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2007.05.002.
GIBSON, John; RIOJA, Felix. The welfare effects of infrastructure investment in a heterogeneous agents economy. The BE Journal of Macroeconomics, v. 20, n. 1, p. 20190095, 2020.
GONZALEZ, Carlos. The evaluation of regulatory and governance reforms in European Network industries: A Natural Language Processing approach. 2023. Tese de Doutorado. Université PSL (Paris Sciences & Lettres). Disponível em: https://hal.science/tel-04200220/. Aceso em: 5 mar. 2024.
GUASCH, J. Luis. Granting and renegotiating infrastructure concessions: Doing it right. World Bank Publications, pág. 77, 2004.
GUJARATI, Damodar N. Essentials of Econometrics. 5. ed. Newbury Park: Sage Pubs, 2021. 632 p. ISBN-10: 1071850393. ISBN-13: 978-1071850398.
HAMADA, Robert S. The effect of the firm's capital structure on the systematic risk of common stocks. The Journal of Finance, [s. l.], v. 27, n. 2, p. 435-452, maio 1972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2978486.
HEIM, Sven; KRIEGER, Bastian; LIEBENSTEINER, Mario. Legal unbundling, regulation and pricing: evidence from electricity distribution. ZEW – Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, [s. l.], v. 42, n. 1, n. 18-050, nov. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.41.Sl1.shei.
HONG, Gwangheon; SARKAR, Sudipto. Equity systematic risk (Beta) and its determinants. Contemporary Accounting Research, [s. l.], v. 24, n. 2, p. 423-466, jun. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1506/8187-56KM-6511-Q532.
JENSEN, Michael C.; MECKLING, William H. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, [s. l.], v. 3, n. 4, p. 305-360, out. 1976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
KARAKOC, Deniz Berfin; BARKER, Kash; GONZÁLEZ, Andrés D. Analyzing the tradeoff between vulnerability and recoverability investments for interdependent 147 infrastructure networks. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, v. 87, p. 101508, 2023.
KAUFMANN, Daniel; KRAAY, Aart; MASTRUZZI, Massimo. The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on The Rule of Law, [s. l.], v. 3, n. 2, p. 220-246, jan. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404511200046.
KPMG. Emerging Trends in Infrastructure. 2024. Disponível em: https://kpmg.com/xx/em/home/insights/2024/01/emerging-trends-ininfrastructure.html. Acesso em: 09 mar 2024.
KENNEDY, Peter. A Guide to Econometrics. 6. ed. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008. 608 p. ISBN-10: 1405182571. ISBN-13: 978-1405182577.
KUPEC, Blazej; LIGHTBOWN, Sean. Why investing in infrastructure could build out your portfolio in 2023. Moonfare, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.moonfare.com/blog/infrastructure-investment-opportunities-risks. Acesso em: 20 dez 2023.
LEV, Baruch. On the association between operating leverage and risk. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, [s. l.], v. 9, n. 4, p. 627-641, set. 1974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2329764.
LINTNER, John. The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, [s. l.], v. 47, n. 1, p. 13-37, fev. 1965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1924119.
MARQUES, Rui Cunha. A yardstick competition model for Portuguese water and sewerage services regulation. Utilities Policy, [s. l.], v. 14, n. 3, p. 175-184, set. 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2006.03.004.
MEGGINSON, William L.; MUELLER, Peter C. Natural monopoly privatization: minimizing regulatory trade-offs between rent extraction and innovation. Academy of Management Perspectives, [s. l.], v. 36, n. 1, p. 111-124, fev. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2019.0170.
MOSSIN, Jan. Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica, [s. l.], v. 34, n. 4, p. 768-783, out. 1966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1910098.
NAKATANI, Ryota. Productivity drivers of infrastructure companies: network industries utilizing economies of scale in the digital era. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, [s. l.], v. 94, n. 4, p. 1273-1298, jun. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12412.
NOROUZI, Nima; FANI, Maryam. Monopoly and competition in the energy market: A legal analysis. Global Journal of Business Management, v. 15, n. 2, p. 001-007, 2021.
NORTON, Seth W. Regulation and systematic risk: the case of electric utilities. The Journal of Law and Economics, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 3, p. 671-686, out. 1985.
NWAEZE, Emeka T. Positive and negative earnings surprises, regulatory climate, and stock returns. Contemporary Accounting Research, [s. l.], v. 17, n. 1, p. 107-134, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2000.tb00913.x.
ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). Indicators of product market regulation. [S. l]: OECD, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.oecd.org/economy/reform/indicators-of-product-market-regulation/. Acesso em: 4 nov. 2023.
ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). Glossary of statistical terms. [S. l.] OECD, 2008. Disponível em: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-glossary-of-statistical-terms_9789264055087-en#page270.
ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). Green Infrastructure in the decade for delivery: assessing institutional investment in infrastructure. [S. l.]: OECD, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/f51f9256-en/1/3/2/index.html?itemId=/content/publication/f51f9256-en&_csp_=7d5d22ec82800d8235fe1f2706f7224f&itemIGO=oecd&itemContentType=book#section-d1e2504. Acesso em: 6 mar. 2024.
ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19). COVID-19 emergency government support and ensuring a level playing field on the road to recovery. OECD, [s. l.], 21 out. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/covid-19-emergency-government-support-and-ensuring-a-level-playing-field-on-the-road-to-recovery-1e5a04de/. Acesso em: 6 mar. 2024.
PARKER, David. Price cap regulation, profitability and returns to investors in the UK regulated industries. Utilities Policy, [s. l.], v. 6, n. 4, p. 303-315, dez.1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-1787(97)00027-1.
PARKER, David; KIRKPATRICK, Colin. Measuring regulatory performance. The economic impact of regulatory policy: A literature review of quantitative evidence. Expert Paper No. 3, OECD, 2012.
, Roberta; RANIERI, Luigi; COSTANTINO, Nicola; MUMMOLO, Giovanni. A real options-based model to supporting risk allocation in price cap regulation approach for public utilities. Construction Management and Economics, [s. l.], v. 29, n. 12, p. 1197-1207, dez. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.647828.
PELTZMAN, S. Toward a more general theory of regulation. The Journal of Law and Economics, [s. l.], v. 19, n. 2, p. 211-240, ago. 1976.
PINDYCK, Robert S.; RUBINFELD, Daniel L. Microeconomia. Tradução: Eleutério Prado, Thelma Guimarães e Luciana do Amaral Teixeira. 7. ed. São Paulo: Pearson Education do Brasil, 2010. 647 p. ISBN: 9788576052142.
POLEMIS, Michael L.; STENGOS, Thanasis. The impact of regulatory quality on business venturing: A semi-parametric approach. Economic Analysis and Policy, v. 67, p. 29-36, 2020
POUDINEH, Rahmatallah; PENG, Donna; MIRNEZAMI, Seyed Reza. Innovation in regulated electricity networks: incentivising tasks with highly uncertain outcomes. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, [s. l.], v. 21, n. 2, p. 166-192, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1783591720906582.
RAMMAL, Hussain Gulzar; ZURBRUEGG, Ralf. The impact of regulatory quality on intra-foreign direct investment flows in the ASEAN markets. International Business Review, v. 15, n. 4, p. 401-414, 2006.
ROBINSON, T. A.; TAYLOR, M. P. The effects of regulation and regulatory risk in the UK Electricity Distribution Industry. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, [s. l.], v. 69, n. 3, p. 331-346, set. 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8292.00084.
ROSS, Stephen A.; WESTERFIELD, Randolph W.; JAFFE, Jeffrey F. Corporate Finance. 8. ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2002.
ROSSI, Martin Antonio.; RUZZIER, Christian. A. On the regulatory application of efficiency measures. Utilities Policy, [s. l.], v. 9, n. 2, p. 81-92, jun. 2000.
SAL, A.; DAR, Atul A. On explaining inter-country differences in economic growth rates of oecd countries for 1996-2008: does regulatory quality matter?. Applied Econometrics and International Development, v. 12, n. 2, 2012.
SANYAL, Paroma; BULAN, Laarni T. Regulatory risk, market uncertainties, and firm financing choices: evidence from U.S. electricity market restructuring. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, [s. l.], v. 51, n. 3, p. 248-268, jun. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gref.2011.01.006.
SARMIENTO-SABOGAL, Julio Alejandro; SADEGHI, M. Estimating the cost of equity for private firms using accounting fundamentals. Applied Economics, [s. l.], v. 47, n. 3, p. 288-301, jan. 2015.
SHARPE, William F. Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, [s. l.], v. 19, n. 3, p. 425-442, set. 1964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x.
SIMSHAUSER, Paul; LAOCHUMNANVANIT, Kay. The political economy of regulating retail electricity price caps in a rising cost environment. The Electricity Journal, [s. l.], v. 25, n. 9, p. 48-66, nov. 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2012.10.013.
SINGH, Kewal; SINGH, Anoop; PRAKASH, Puneet. Estimating the cost of equity for the regulated energy and infrastructure sectors in India. Utilities Policy, v. 74, p. 101327, 2022.
SIRTAINE, S.; PINGLO, M. E.; GUASCH, J. L.; FOSTER, V. How profitable are private infrastructure concessions in Latin America?: Empirical evidence and regulatory implications. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, v. 45, n. 2-3, p. 380-402, 2005.
TAHVANAINEN, Kaisa; HONKAPURO, Samuli; PARTANEN, Jarmo; VILJAINEN, Satu. Experiences of modern rate of return regulation in Finland. Utilities Policy, [s. l.], v. 21, p. 32-39, jun. 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2012.01.001.
TAX FOUNDATION. Corporate Income Taxes. [S. l.], 2023. Disponível em: https://taxfoundation.org/topics/corporate-income-taxes/.
THE WORLD BANK (WB). A decade of measuring the quality of governance: governance matters 2007, worldwide governance indicators, 1996-2007. Washington: The World Bank, 2007. 24 p.
THE WORLD BANK (WB). TCdata360: regulatory quality, 2022. [S. l.], 2023. Disponível em: https://tcdata360.worldbank.org/indicators/51ada6ba?country=BRA&indicator=40283&viz=line_chart&years=2013,2020. Acesso em: 6 mar. 2024.
TIROLE, Jean. Market failures and public policy. American Economic Review, [s. l.], v. 105, n. 6, p. 1665-1682, jun. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.15000024.
TOBIASSON, Wenche; LLORCA, Manuel; JAMASB, Tooraj. Performance effects of network structure and ownership: the Norwegian electricity distribution sector. Energies, [s. l.], v. 14, n. 21, article 7160, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217160.
TULLOCH, Daniel J.; DIAZ-RAINEY, Ivan; PREMACHANDRA, I. M. The impact of regulatory change on EU energy utility returns: the three liberalization packages. Applied Economics, [s. l.], v. 50, n. 9, p. 957-972, fev. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1346366.
VILLADSEN, Bente; VILBERT, Michael J.; HARRIS, Dan; KOLBE, Lawrence. Risk and return for regulated industries. Cambridge: Academic Press, 2017. 354 p. ISBN-10: 012812587X. ISBN-13: 978-0128125878.
WOLFL, A.; WANNER, I.; KOZLUK, T.; NICOLETTI, G. Years of Product Market Reform in OECD Countries. OECD Economic Department Working Papers, n. 695, 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1690962.
WRIGHT, Stephen; MASON, Robin; MILES, David. A study into certain aspects of the cost of capital for regulated utilities in the UK. London: Smithers & Company Limited, 2003.
YAN, Wenshou; YANG, Xi. A New Motivation for Sustainable Trade Between Countries with Different Regulatory Qualities. Sustainability, v. 12, n. 1, p. 209, 2019.
ZÁMBORSKÝ, P.; YAN, Z. J.; SBAÏ, E.; LARSEN, M. Cross-border M&A motives and home country institutions: Role of regulatory quality and dynamics in the Asia-Pacific Region. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, v. 14, n. 10, p. 468, 2021.
ZHAO, Hongxin; KIM, Seung H. An exploratory examination of the social capital and FDI linkage and the moderating role of regulatory quality: A cross‐country study. Thunderbird International Business Review, v. 53, n. 5, p. 629-646, 2011.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Revista de Contabilidade do Mestrado em Ciências Contábeis da UERJ
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Os direitos patrimoniais dos artigos aceitos para publicação, inclusive de tradução, passam a ser de propriedade da Revista de Contabilidade do Mestrado em Ciências Contábeis da UERJ (online).
É permitida a citação parcial de artigos publicados, sem autorização prévia, desde que seja identificada a fonte. A reprodução total de artigos é proibida. Em caso de dúvidas, favor entrar em contato: (revistacontabilidadeuerj@gmail.com).
As declarações dos artigos aprovados, devem ser originalmente assinadas e enviadas por e-mail para o endereço de contato da revista.
