Influência de regimes e ambiente regulatório sobre o risco sistemático das empresas reguladas de infraestrutura

Authors

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the relationship between regulatory regimes and environments with the systematic risk of regulated infrastructure companies across different sectors and countries. Research on the relationship between regulatory regimes that offer more incentives for efficiency, regulatory environments that are more favorable to competition, and regulatory quality on the systematic risk of regulated companies using cross-sectional variables is scarce. The findings demonstrated that regulatory regimes with greater power to encourage efficiency and environments with higher regulatory quality are negatively associated with systematic risks; alternatively, environments more favorable to competition are positively associated with systematic risks. This work contributes to the literature by demonstrating how regulatory risk can affect systematic risk and, therefore, the return on capital invested in regulated network infrastructure companies from different countries. It also assists investors in their decision-making. Additionally, it empirically contributes to regulators and public policy makers by demonstrating the relevance of the regulatory environment and mechanisms to encourage efficiency and their effect on systematic risk, internalizing such effects into the regulatory process. By highlighting factors that can affect the price of public services, this work contributes to a better understanding of the regulatory process by consumers. Finally, the research helps preparers and auditors by demonstrating how regulation can affect the systematic risk of regulated companies, enabling them to evaluate their accounting choices in this scenario. To achieve these results, an analysis was carried out with panel data from 174 companies in 27 countries, spanning different regulated infrastructure sectors, using multiple linear regression for the period from 2010 to 2021.

Author Biographies

Vanessa Rodrigues dos Santos Cardoso, Universidade de Brasília

Economista, pela UNEB-DF. Mestra e Doutora em Ciências Contábeis pelo PPGCONT da UnB/FACE/CCA

Paulo Augusto Pettenuzzo de Britto, Universidade de Brasília

Doutor em Economia pela University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)

Professor Associado da Universidade de Brasília (UnB)

References

ABD RASHID, S.; MASRON, T.; MALIM, N. A.. The effect of corruption on entrepreneurship in the presence of weak regulatory quality: Evidence from developing countries. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, v. 86, p. 101476, 2023.

AGYEMAN, Stephen Duah; LIN, Boqiang. Electricity industry (de) regulation and innovation in negative-emission technologies: how do market liberalization influences climate change mitigation?. Energy, [s. l.], v. 270, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.126863.

AHMIĆ, Azra; ISOVIĆ, Ilma. The impact of regulatory quality on deepens level of financial integration: Evidence from the European Union countries (NMS-10). Economics-Innovative and Economics Research Journal, v. 11, n. 1, p. 127-142, 2023.

ALEXANDER, Ian; ESTACHE, Antonio; OLIVERI, Adele. A few things transport regulators should know about risk and the cost of capital. Utilities Policy, [s. l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 1-13, mar. 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-1787(00)00006-0.

ALEXANDER, Ian; MAYER, Colin; WEEDS, Helen. Regulatory structure and risk and infrastructure firms: an international comparison. Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank, [s. l.], nov. 1999.

ALIZADEH, Ali; FEREIDUNIAN, Alireza; KAMWA, Innocent; MOHSENI-BONAB, Seyed Masoud; LESANI, Hamid. A multi-period regulation methodology for reliability as service quality considering reward-penalty scheme. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, [s. l.], v. 38, n. 2, p. 1440-1451, out. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2022.3215964.

ARBLASTER, Margaret. Regulation in markets facing uncertainty: the case of Australia. Journal of Air Transport Management, [s. l.], v. 67, p. 249-258, mar. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.03.007.

ARNOLD, Jens Matthias; WÖRGÖTTER, Andreas. Structural reforms and the benefits of the enlarged EU internal market: still much to be gained. Applied Economics Letters, v. 18, n. 13, p. 1231-1235, 2011.

ATUL, D. A. R.; AMIRKHALKHALI, Sal. On the Impact of Openness and Regulatory Quality on Saving-Investment Dynamics in Emerging Economies. Applied Econometrics and International Development, v. 11, n. 2, 2011.

BAUMOL, William J.; WILLIG, Robert D. Fixed costs, sunk costs, entry barriers, and sustainability of monopoly. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, [s. l.], v. 96, n. 3, p. 405-431, ago. 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1882680.

BEAVER, William; KETTLER, Paul; SCHOLES, Myron. The association between market-determined and accounting-determined risk measures. The Accounting Review, [s. l.], v. 45, n. 4, p. 654-682, out. 1970. Disponível em: https://www.paulcarlislekettler.net/docs/Beaver_Kettler_Scholes.pdf.

BINDER, John J.; NORTON, Seth W. Regulation, profit variability and beta. Journal of Regulatory Economics, [s. l.], v. 15, n. 3, p. 249-266, maio 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008078230272. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5155975_Regulation_Profit_Variability_and_Beta.

BIRD, Ron; LIEM, Harry; THORP, Susan. Infrastructure: real assets and real returns. European Financial Management, [s. l.], v. 20, n. 4, p. 802-824, maio 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2012.00650.x.

BRASIL. Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica. Superintendência de Regulação Econômica e Estudos do Mercado. Taxa Regulatória de Remuneração do Capital: Relatório de Análise de Impacto Regulatório nº 3/2018 – SRM/ANEEL. Brasília: ANEEL, 2018.

BRIMBLE, Mark; HODGSON, Allan. Assessing the risk relevance of accounting variables in diverse economic conditions. Managerial Finance, [s. l.], v. 33, n. 8, p. 553-573, jul. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350710760296.

BUCKLAND, Roger; WILLIAMS, Julian; BEECHER, Janice. Risk and regulation in water utilities: a cross-country comparison of evidence from the CAPM. Journal of Regulatory Economics, [s. l.], v. 47, n. 2, p. 117-145, abr. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-014-9261-z.

BUTLER, Michael R.; MCNERTNEY, Edward M. Election returns as a signal of changing regulatory climate. Energy Economics, [s. l.], v. 13, n. 1, p. 48-54, jan. 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-9883(91)90055-5.

CABRERA JUNIOR, Enrique; ESTRUCH-JUAN, Elvira; GÓMEZ, Elena; DEL TESO, Roberto. Comprehensive regulation of water services. why quality of service and economic costs cannot be considered separately. Water Resources Management, [s. l.], v. 36, n. 3, p. 3247-3264, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03198-x.

CEBULA, Richard J.; MIXON JR, Franklin G. The roles of economic freedom and regulatory quality in creating a favorable environment for investment in energy R & D, infrastructure, and capacity. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, v. 73, n. 2, p. 299-324, 2014.

CEBULA, Richard J.; CLARK, J. R. The effects of economic freedom, regulatory quality and taxation on the level of per capita real income: a preliminary analysis for OECD nations and non-G8 OECD nations. Applied Economics, v. 46, n. 31, p. 3836-3848, 2014.

COLLAN, Mikael; SAVOLAINEN, Jyrki; LILJA, Emma. Analyzing the returns and rate of return regulation of Finnish electricity distribution system operators 2015-2019. Energy Policy, [s. l.], v. 160, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112677.

CONWAY, Paul; HERD, Richard. How competitive is product market regulation in India?: an international and cross-state comparison. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, [s. l.], p. 1-25, 2009. ISSN: 1995-2848. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227461334_How_competitive_is_product_market_regulation_in_India_An_international_and_cross-state_comparison Acesso em: 10 mar. 2024.

COUNCIL OF EUROPEAN ENERGY REGULATORS (CEER). Report on Regulatory Frameworks for European Energy Networks 2020: incentive regulation and benchmarking work stream. Bruxelas, 19 jan. 2023.

DAMODARAN, Aswath. Damodaran on valuation: security analysis for investment and corporate finance. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1994. 464 p. ISBN-10: ‎0471014508. ISBN-13: ‎978-0471014508.

DONALDSON, Dave. Railroads of the Raj: Estimating the impact of transportation infrastructure. American Economic Review, v. 108, n. 4-5, p. 899-934, 2018.

ÉGERT, Balázs. Public policy reforms and their impact on productivity, investment and employment: new evidence from OECD and non-OECD countries. Public Sector Economics, [s. l.], v. 46, n. 2, p. 179-205, jun. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3326/pse.46.2.1.

FREEMAN, Robert N. The association between accounting earnings and security returns for large and small firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, [s. l.], v. 9, n. 2, p. 195-228, jul. 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(87)90005-X.

GAGGERO, A. A. Regulation and risk: a cross-country survey of regulated companies. Bulletin of Economic Research, [s. l.], v. 64, n. 2, p. 226-238, abr. 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8586.2010.00360.x.

GAGGERO, Alberto A. Regulatory risk in the utilities industry: an empirical study of the English-speaking countries. Utilities Policy, [s. l.], v. 15, n. 3, p. 191-205, set. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2007.05.002.

GIBSON, John; RIOJA, Felix. The welfare effects of infrastructure investment in a heterogeneous agents economy. The BE Journal of Macroeconomics, v. 20, n. 1, p. 20190095, 2020.

GONZALEZ, Carlos. The evaluation of regulatory and governance reforms in European Network industries: A Natural Language Processing approach. 2023. Tese de Doutorado. Université PSL (Paris Sciences & Lettres). Disponível em: https://hal.science/tel-04200220/. Aceso em: 5 mar. 2024.

GUASCH, J. Luis. Granting and renegotiating infrastructure concessions: Doing it right. World Bank Publications, pág. 77, 2004.

GUJARATI, Damodar N. Essentials of Econometrics. 5. ed. Newbury Park: Sage Pubs, 2021. 632 p. ISBN-10: ‎1071850393. ISBN-13: 978-1071850398.

HAMADA, Robert S. The effect of the firm's capital structure on the systematic risk of common stocks. The Journal of Finance, [s. l.], v. 27, n. 2, p. 435-452, maio 1972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2978486.

HEIM, Sven; KRIEGER, Bastian; LIEBENSTEINER, Mario. Legal unbundling, regulation and pricing: evidence from electricity distribution. ZEW – Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, [s. l.], v. 42, n. 1, n. 18-050, nov. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.41.Sl1.shei.

HONG, Gwangheon; SARKAR, Sudipto. Equity systematic risk (Beta) and its determinants. Contemporary Accounting Research, [s. l.], v. 24, n. 2, p. 423-466, jun. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1506/8187-56KM-6511-Q532.

JENSEN, Michael C.; MECKLING, William H. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, [s. l.], v. 3, n. 4, p. 305-360, out. 1976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.

KARAKOC, Deniz Berfin; BARKER, Kash; GONZÁLEZ, Andrés D. Analyzing the tradeoff between vulnerability and recoverability investments for interdependent 147 infrastructure networks. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, v. 87, p. 101508, 2023.

KAUFMANN, Daniel; KRAAY, Aart; MASTRUZZI, Massimo. The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on The Rule of Law, [s. l.], v. 3, n. 2, p. 220-246, jan. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404511200046.

KPMG. Emerging Trends in Infrastructure. 2024. Disponível em: https://kpmg.com/xx/em/home/insights/2024/01/emerging-trends-ininfrastructure.html. Acesso em: 09 mar 2024.

KENNEDY, Peter. A Guide to Econometrics. 6. ed. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008. 608 p. ISBN-10: ‎1405182571. ISBN-13: ‎978-1405182577.

KUPEC, Blazej; LIGHTBOWN, Sean. Why investing in infrastructure could build out your portfolio in 2023. Moonfare, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.moonfare.com/blog/infrastructure-investment-opportunities-risks. Acesso em: 20 dez 2023.

LEV, Baruch. On the association between operating leverage and risk. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, [s. l.], v. 9, n. 4, p. 627-641, set. 1974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2329764.

LINTNER, John. The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, [s. l.], v. 47, n. 1, p. 13-37, fev. 1965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1924119.

MARQUES, Rui Cunha. A yardstick competition model for Portuguese water and sewerage services regulation. Utilities Policy, [s. l.], v. 14, n. 3, p. 175-184, set. 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2006.03.004.

MEGGINSON, William L.; MUELLER, Peter C. Natural monopoly privatization: minimizing regulatory trade-offs between rent extraction and innovation. Academy of Management Perspectives, [s. l.], v. 36, n. 1, p. 111-124, fev. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2019.0170.

MOSSIN, Jan. Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica, [s. l.], v. 34, n. 4, p. 768-783, out. 1966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1910098.

NAKATANI, Ryota. Productivity drivers of infrastructure companies: network industries utilizing economies of scale in the digital era. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, [s. l.], v. 94, n. 4, p. 1273-1298, jun. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12412.

NOROUZI, Nima; FANI, Maryam. Monopoly and competition in the energy market: A legal analysis. Global Journal of Business Management, v. 15, n. 2, p. 001-007, 2021.

NORTON, Seth W. Regulation and systematic risk: the case of electric utilities. The Journal of Law and Economics, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 3, p. 671-686, out. 1985.

NWAEZE, Emeka T. Positive and negative earnings surprises, regulatory climate, and stock returns. Contemporary Accounting Research, [s. l.], v. 17, n. 1, p. 107-134, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2000.tb00913.x.

ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). Indicators of product market regulation. [S. l]: OECD, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.oecd.org/economy/reform/indicators-of-product-market-regulation/. Acesso em: 4 nov. 2023.

ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). Glossary of statistical terms. [S. l.] OECD, 2008. Disponível em: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-glossary-of-statistical-terms_9789264055087-en#page270.

ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). Green Infrastructure in the decade for delivery: assessing institutional investment in infrastructure. [S. l.]: OECD, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/f51f9256-en/1/3/2/index.html?itemId=/content/publication/f51f9256-en&_csp_=7d5d22ec82800d8235fe1f2706f7224f&itemIGO=oecd&itemContentType=book#section-d1e2504. Acesso em: 6 mar. 2024.

ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19). COVID-19 emergency government support and ensuring a level playing field on the road to recovery. OECD, [s. l.], 21 out. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/covid-19-emergency-government-support-and-ensuring-a-level-playing-field-on-the-road-to-recovery-1e5a04de/. Acesso em: 6 mar. 2024.

PARKER, David. Price cap regulation, profitability and returns to investors in the UK regulated industries. Utilities Policy, [s. l.], v. 6, n. 4, p. 303-315, dez.1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-1787(97)00027-1.

PARKER, David; KIRKPATRICK, Colin. Measuring regulatory performance. The economic impact of regulatory policy: A literature review of quantitative evidence. Expert Paper No. 3, OECD, 2012.

, Roberta; RANIERI, Luigi; COSTANTINO, Nicola; MUMMOLO, Giovanni. A real options-based model to supporting risk allocation in price cap regulation approach for public utilities. Construction Management and Economics, [s. l.], v. 29, n. 12, p. 1197-1207, dez. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.647828.

PELTZMAN, S. Toward a more general theory of regulation. The Journal of Law and Economics, [s. l.], v. 19, n. 2, p. 211-240, ago. 1976.

PINDYCK, Robert S.; RUBINFELD, Daniel L. Microeconomia. Tradução: Eleutério Prado, Thelma Guimarães e Luciana do Amaral Teixeira. 7. ed. São Paulo: Pearson Education do Brasil, 2010. 647 p. ISBN: 9788576052142.

POLEMIS, Michael L.; STENGOS, Thanasis. The impact of regulatory quality on business venturing: A semi-parametric approach. Economic Analysis and Policy, v. 67, p. 29-36, 2020

POUDINEH, Rahmatallah; PENG, Donna; MIRNEZAMI, Seyed Reza. Innovation in regulated electricity networks: incentivising tasks with highly uncertain outcomes. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, [s. l.], v. 21, n. 2, p. 166-192, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1783591720906582.

RAMMAL, Hussain Gulzar; ZURBRUEGG, Ralf. The impact of regulatory quality on intra-foreign direct investment flows in the ASEAN markets. International Business Review, v. 15, n. 4, p. 401-414, 2006.

ROBINSON, T. A.; TAYLOR, M. P. The effects of regulation and regulatory risk in the UK Electricity Distribution Industry. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, [s. l.], v. 69, n. 3, p. 331-346, set. 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8292.00084.

ROSS, Stephen A.; WESTERFIELD, Randolph W.; JAFFE, Jeffrey F. Corporate Finance. 8. ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2002.

ROSSI, Martin Antonio.; RUZZIER, Christian. A. On the regulatory application of efficiency measures. Utilities Policy, [s. l.], v. 9, n. 2, p. 81-92, jun. 2000.

SAL, A.; DAR, Atul A. On explaining inter-country differences in economic growth rates of oecd countries for 1996-2008: does regulatory quality matter?. Applied Econometrics and International Development, v. 12, n. 2, 2012.

SANYAL, Paroma; BULAN, Laarni T. Regulatory risk, market uncertainties, and firm financing choices: evidence from U.S. electricity market restructuring. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, [s. l.], v. 51, n. 3, p. 248-268, jun. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gref.2011.01.006.

SARMIENTO-SABOGAL, Julio Alejandro; SADEGHI, M. Estimating the cost of equity for private firms using accounting fundamentals. Applied Economics, [s. l.], v. 47, n. 3, p. 288-301, jan. 2015.

SHARPE, William F. Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, [s. l.], v. 19, n. 3, p. 425-442, set. 1964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x.

SIMSHAUSER, Paul; LAOCHUMNANVANIT, Kay. The political economy of regulating retail electricity price caps in a rising cost environment. The Electricity Journal, [s. l.], v. 25, n. 9, p. 48-66, nov. 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2012.10.013.

SINGH, Kewal; SINGH, Anoop; PRAKASH, Puneet. Estimating the cost of equity for the regulated energy and infrastructure sectors in India. Utilities Policy, v. 74, p. 101327, 2022.

SIRTAINE, S.; PINGLO, M. E.; GUASCH, J. L.; FOSTER, V. How profitable are private infrastructure concessions in Latin America?: Empirical evidence and regulatory implications. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, v. 45, n. 2-3, p. 380-402, 2005.

TAHVANAINEN, Kaisa; HONKAPURO, Samuli; PARTANEN, Jarmo; VILJAINEN, Satu. Experiences of modern rate of return regulation in Finland. Utilities Policy, [s. l.], v. 21, p. 32-39, jun. 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2012.01.001.

TAX FOUNDATION. Corporate Income Taxes. [S. l.], 2023. Disponível em: https://taxfoundation.org/topics/corporate-income-taxes/.

THE WORLD BANK (WB). A decade of measuring the quality of governance: governance matters 2007, worldwide governance indicators, 1996-2007. Washington: The World Bank, 2007. 24 p.

THE WORLD BANK (WB). TCdata360: regulatory quality, 2022. [S. l.], 2023. Disponível em: https://tcdata360.worldbank.org/indicators/51ada6ba?country=BRA&indicator=40283&viz=line_chart&years=2013,2020. Acesso em: 6 mar. 2024.

TIROLE, Jean. Market failures and public policy. American Economic Review, [s. l.], v. 105, n. 6, p. 1665-1682, jun. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.15000024.

TOBIASSON, Wenche; LLORCA, Manuel; JAMASB, Tooraj. Performance effects of network structure and ownership: the Norwegian electricity distribution sector. Energies, [s. l.], v. 14, n. 21, article 7160, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217160.

TULLOCH, Daniel J.; DIAZ-RAINEY, Ivan; PREMACHANDRA, I. M. The impact of regulatory change on EU energy utility returns: the three liberalization packages. Applied Economics, [s. l.], v. 50, n. 9, p. 957-972, fev. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1346366.

VILLADSEN, Bente; VILBERT, Michael J.; HARRIS, Dan; KOLBE, Lawrence. Risk and return for regulated industries. Cambridge: Academic Press, 2017. 354 p. ISBN-10: 012812587X. ISBN-13: 978-0128125878.

WOLFL, A.; WANNER, I.; KOZLUK, T.; NICOLETTI, G. Years of Product Market Reform in OECD Countries. OECD Economic Department Working Papers, n. 695, 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1690962.

WRIGHT, Stephen; MASON, Robin; MILES, David. A study into certain aspects of the cost of capital for regulated utilities in the UK. London: Smithers & Company Limited, 2003.

YAN, Wenshou; YANG, Xi. A New Motivation for Sustainable Trade Between Countries with Different Regulatory Qualities. Sustainability, v. 12, n. 1, p. 209, 2019.

ZÁMBORSKÝ, P.; YAN, Z. J.; SBAÏ, E.; LARSEN, M. Cross-border M&A motives and home country institutions: Role of regulatory quality and dynamics in the Asia-Pacific Region. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, v. 14, n. 10, p. 468, 2021.

ZHAO, Hongxin; KIM, Seung H. An exploratory examination of the social capital and FDI linkage and the moderating role of regulatory quality: A cross‐country study. Thunderbird International Business Review, v. 53, n. 5, p. 629-646, 2011.

Published

2024-10-13

How to Cite

Cardoso, V. R. dos S., & Britto, P. A. P. de. (2024). Influência de regimes e ambiente regulatório sobre o risco sistemático das empresas reguladas de infraestrutura. Revista De Contabilidade Do Mestrado Em Ciências Contábeis Da UERJ, 29(3), 123–145. Retrieved from https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/rcmccuerj/article/view/86344

Issue

Section

Artigos