Theological and Political Roots of Constitutional Modernity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/publicum.2015.20220Keywords:
Political Theology, Constitution, Constitucionalism, Constitucional Modernity, Secularization and Sacralization.Abstract
In Brazil, are politics and religion arguable? This paper aims to present a new interpretive approach in the political literature of the usual concepts of "constitutionalism" and "constitution" in the "constitutional modernity." It is an effort to explain the historical and semantic roots of these expressions, from the idea that theological conceptions are connected inextricably with the sense of political institutions. The main literature on Political Theology as a scientific object was produced in Germany of the twentieth century and is still undervalued in Brazil. Although the theological-political premise could be doubtful, the reflection on its validity - and its use as a hermeneutic tool of historical concepts - still matters. The definitive diagnosis of constitutional modernity points out to the decline of the semantic power of constitutional concepts and the disintegration of representative institutions. The goal here is to review the primary literature of Political Theology, pointing its evolution and the main conclusions of the main authors, with emphasis on the relevance of these studies as a source of distrust both of euphorical defense of constitutional ideology as of the need for annihilating all civilization gains generated by it. Certainly, there is much to be done to fully understand the decline of the central institutions of Brazilian democracy in the constitutional modernity. This new glance gives only a modest contribution in this pursuit.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author(s) of the paper declare(s) to know and agree to the following rules:
1) The author(s) undertook the work presented to the journal, being entirely responsible for the ideas and concepts therein transmitted, which do not necessarily correspond to the point of view of Publicum’s Editors.
2) The ethical principles alluded to in the evaluation policy of the journal [RDN1] were met in the conduction of the work presented to submission.
3) The author(s) assume(s) authorship and responsibility for their work, declaring that it does not infringe any third party intellectual property rights.
4) The author(s) take(s) full responsibility for moral or patrimonial damages that the distribution of the work may generate to third parties.
5) The author(s) grant(s) the journal the rights to reproduce, edit and first publish the paper in any media – in particular in digital form – in an electronic archive on the Internet.
6) The author(s) confer(s) the right to the editors to modify the text submitted, without prejudice of its contents, when necessary to standardize the presentation of the works and to meet the norms of the journals’ own edition.
7) The author(s) agree(s) to the final form of the paper approved by the journal.
8) The author(s) authorize(s) the disclosure of the paper in the channels of communication of the Faculty of Law of UERJ.
9) The author(s) agree(s) with the reproduction of short extracts from the paper in other UERJ publications.
10) The author(s) recognize(s) that, through the abovementioned assignment and authorizations, he/she/they will not receive payment under any modality, meaning these will have the nature of scientific collaboration.
11) The author(s) is(are) aware that publication of the work may be refused if it is not considered appropriate, for any reason, whatsoever, and such refusal does not create responsibility and/or burdens of any kind to the journal or UERJ.
[RDN1]Ver COPE.
Publicum está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.