Quando um não quer, dois não brigam? O discurso do presidente Lula perante a guerra Russo-ucraniana | When one doesn’t want to, two don’t fight? President Lula’s discourse vis-à-vis the Russo-Ukrainian war
Palavras-chave:
guerra Russo-Ucraniana, Lula, política externa brasileiraResumo
A volta de Lula à presidência brasileira marca o retorno do multilateralismo como princípio norteador da política externa brasileira. Nisso, a guerra na Ucrânia serve de campo de teste para a restauração de uma política construída em torno da ambição brasileira de empenhar um papel como mediador nos conflitos internacionais. Esse artigo busca entender como o presidente Lula da Silva enquadra a guerra à luz dos objetivos mais gerais da política externa brasileira. Utilizando o método da análise de framing em todo o discurso oficial do presidente Lula (compreendendo 94 discursos, entrevistas e tweets) em relação à guerra russo-ucraniana desde a sua posse em 1 de janeiro até 7 de outubro de 2023, quando a guerra Israel-Hamas começou a dominar a agenda, os resultados da nossa pesquisa indicam que o presidente utiliza dois frames principais: o Global South frame, que assinala assimetrias entre norte e sul no arranjo de governança global como a principal causa da guerra, e um frame de conflito (quarrel), que constrói a guerra em termos de um conflito interpessoal.
Downloads
Referências
Adler, D. & Long, G. (2023). ‘Lula’s foreign policy? Encouraging a multipolar world’. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jan/01/brazil-lula-foreign-policy-multipolar-world [Accessed 5 June 2024].
Albuquerque, F. L. (2023). ‘Climate change in Brazil’s foreign policy during Lula’s first year’. Perspectivas Energéticas, 7(17), pp.21-28. Available at: https://programaenergia.colmex.mx/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Perspectivas-energeticas-17.pdf [Accessed 5 December 2024].
Albuquerque, F. L. (2020). ‘Neither revisionism nor status quo: a comparative analysis of Brazil’s foreign policy in multilateral regimes’. Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa. Available at: https://repositorio.ul.pt/handle/10451/46637 [Accessed 18 March 2024].
Amorim, C. (2022). ‘Política internacional e o Brasil no mundo: da unipolaridade consentida à multipolaridade possível’. CEBRI-Revista, 1(1), pp.19-32. Available at: https://cebri-revista.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/4/3 [Accessed 5 December 2024].
Belém Lopes, D. & Vázquez, K. C. (2024). ‘Peace as a hypothetical imperative: Brazil's foreign policy standpoint on the war in Ukraine’. Global Policy. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1758-5899.13334 [Accessed 13 August 2024].
Belém Lopes, D. & Vázquez, K. C. (2024). ‘Brazil’s position in the Russia-Ukraine war: Balancing principled pragmatism while countering weaponized interdependence’. Contemporary Security Policy. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/13523260.2024.2384004?needAccess=true [Accessed 13 August 2024].
Benford, R. D. & Snow, D. A. (2000). ‘Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment’. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), pp.611-639. Available at: https://fbaum.unc.edu/teaching/articles/AnnRevSoc-2000-Benford.pdf [Accessed 5 December 2024].
Brazil. (2023a). Discurso do embaixador Mauro Vieira por ocasião da posse no cargo de ministro de estado das relações exteriores. Brasília, 2 de janeiro de 2023. Available at: https://www.gov.br/funag/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/politica-externa-brasileira/discurso-do-embaixador-mauro-vieira-por-ocasiao-da-posse-no-cargo-de-ministro-de-estado-das-relacoes-exteriores-brasilia-2-de-janeiro-de-2023 [Accessed 31 March 2024].
Brazil. (2023b). Discurso do presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva na abertura da 78ª Assembleia da ONU. Nova Iorque, 19 de setembro de 2023. Available at: https://www.gov.br/planalto/pt-br/acompanhe-o-planalto/discursos-e-pronunciamentos/2023/discurso-do-presidente-luiz-inacio-lula-da-silva-na-abertura-da-78a-assembleia-da-onu [Accessed 19 March 2024].
Buarque, D. & Mikelli, M. (2023). ‘Status and Brazil’s role as a peace mediator: lessons of the foreign perceptions of the failed Tehran deal’. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 66(1), pp.2-20. Available at: https://www.scielo.br/j/rbpi/a/sFkyHZFnyFxF7dJbYCwMsZv/?lang=en [Accessed 5 December 2024].
Burges, S., (2015). ‘Revisiting consensual hegemony: Brazilian regional leadership in question’. International Politics, 52(2), pp.193-207. Available at: https://researchportalplus.anu.edu.au/en/publications/revisiting-consensual-hegemony-brazilian-regional-leadership-in-q/ [Accessed 5 December 2024].
Burges, S. (2024). ‘How to Stay a Leader Without Followers: Brazil’s Foreign Policy Under Lula III’. CEBRI-Revista, 3(9), pp.38-57. Available at: https://cebri.org/revista/en/artigo/136/how-to-stay-a-leader-without-followers-brazils-foreign-policy-under-lula-iii [Accessed 8 December 2024].
Cason, J. W. & Power, T. J. (2009). ‘Presidentialization, Pluralization, and the Rollback of Itamaraty: Explaining Change in Brazilian Foreign Policy Making in the Cardoso-Lula Era’. International Political Science Review, 30(2), pp. 117-140. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25652895 [Accessed 8 December 2024].
Chatin, M. (2018). Brazil: analysis of a rising soft power. London: Routledge.
Entman, R. M. (1993). ‘Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm’. Journal of Communication, 43(4), pp.51–58. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x [Accessed 8 December 2024].
Ferree, M. M.; Gamson, W. A.; Gerhards, J. & Rucht, D. (2002). Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gamson, W. A. & Modigliani, A. (1989). ‘Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach’. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), pp.1-37. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780405 [Accessed 28 November 2024].
Goffman, I. (1986). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience (Northeastern University Press edition). Northeastern University Press.
Guimarães, F. S. & Almeida, M. H. (2018). ‘From middle powers to entrepreneurial powers in world politics: Brazil’s successes and failures in international crises’. Latin American Politics and Society, 59(4), pp.26-66. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/article/from-middle-powers-to-entrepreneurial-powers-in-world-politics-brazils-successes-and-failures-in-international-crises/A41A29EA8FCE0EDB3C0D11D1A5CD125E [Accessed 28 November 2024].
Guimarães, F. S. (2020). ‘The uneasy well-placed state: Brazil within Latin America and the West’. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 33(4), pp.603-619. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09557571.2020.1723059 [Accessed 21 November 2024].
Hurrell, A. (2018). ‘Beyond the BRICS: power, pluralism, and the future of global order’. Ethics & International Affairs, 32(1), pp.89-101. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ethics-and-international-affairs/article/abs/beyond-the-brics-power-pluralism-and-the-future-of-global-order/ADFA38373CACBC39717BCCEC2F7B6119 [Accessed 21 November 2024].
Jornal da Gazeta (2023). ‘Chanceler de Putin diz que Brasil e Rússia tem visão única [Video]’. YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-p94rj6Jfy8 [Accessed 17 April 2023].
Krause, F. (2024). ‘Explaining Brazil’s stance on the Ukraine war’. Bulletin of Latin American Research. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14709856/0/0 [Accessed 13 August 2024].
Lepianka, D. (2015). ‘Images of poverty in a selection of the Polish daily press’. Current Sociology, 63(7), pp.999–1016. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0011392115587021 [Accessed 13 August 2024].
Malamud, A. (2003). ‘O presidencialismo na América do Sul: Argentina e Brasil em perspectiva comparada’. Análise Social, 38(168), pp. 715-742. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41011823.pdf [Accessed 27 April 2023].
Malamud, A. (2011). ‘A leader without followers? The growing divergence between the regional and global performance of Brazilian foreign policy’. Latin American Politics and Society, 53(3), pp.1-24. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society/article/abs/leader-without-followers-the-growing-divergence-between-the-regional-and-global-performance-of-brazilian-foreign-policy/93B2DA654950F3127673AA38AE03FDAF [Accessed 22 April 2023].
Malamud, A. (2017). ‘Foreign policy retreat: domestic and systemic causes of Brazil’s international rollback’. Rising powers quarterly, 2(2), pp.149-168. Available at: https://rpquarterly.kureselcalismalar.com/quarterly/foreign-policy-retreat-domestic-systemic-causes-brazils-international-rollback/ [Accessed 22 April 2023].
Marcondes, D. & Silva, A.R.A. (2023). The role of Brazil in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Journal of International Affairs, 75(2), pp.79-96. Available at: https://jia.sipa.columbia.edu/content/role-brazil-russia-ukraine-conflict-potential-peace-enabler [Accessed 12 December 2025].
Milani, C.R.S., Pinheiro, L. & Lima, M.R.S. (2017). ‘Brazil’s foreign policy and the “graduation dilemma”’. International Affairs, 93(3), pp.585-605. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/ia/article-abstract/93/3/585/3798271 [Accessed 8 May 2024].
Motta, B. V. C. & Succi Junior, D. P. (2023). ‘Brazilian foreign policy for the war in Ukraine: changing non-alignment, counterfactual, and future perspectives’. Globalizations, 20(7), pp.1227-1240. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14747731.2023.2224626 [Accessed 8 May 2024].
Pimenta, G.F. & Teixeira, R.C. (2023). ‘O Brasil e a guerra na Ucrânia: geopolítica e política externa no terceiro governo Lula’. Conjuntura Austral, 14(68), pp.100-112. Available at: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConjunturaAustral/article/view/131977 [Accessed 11 February 2024].
Saraiva, M.G. (2010). ‘A diplomacia brasileira e as visões sobre a inserção externa do Brasil: institucionalistas pragmáticos x autonomistas’. Mural Internacional, 1(1), pp.45-52. Available at: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/muralinternacional/article/view/5285 [Accessed 11 February 2024].
Saraiva, M.G. & Albuquerque, F.L. (2022). ‘Como mudar uma política externa?’. CEBRI-Revista, 1(1), pp. 148-166. Available at: https://cebri-revista.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/10 [Accessed 11 February 2024].
Schenoni, L. L.; Ribeiro, P. F.; Lopes, D.B. & Casarões, G. (2022). ‘Myths of multipolarity: the sources of Brazil’s foreign policy overstretch’. Foreign Policy Analysis, 18(1), pp.1-22. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/fpa/article/18/1/orab037/6502551 [Accessed 13 October 2024].
Schenoni, L. L.; Leiva, D. & Carvalho, T. (2024). ‘The Ukraine war and the limits of Latin American fence-sitting’. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 43(4), pp. 300-304. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/blar.13574 [Accessed 13 October 2024].
Small, M. L.; Harding, D. J. & Lamont, M. (2010). ‘Reconsidering culture and poverty’. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 629(1), pp.6-27. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716210362077 [Accessed 9 October 2024].
Spektor, M. (2023). ‘In defence of fence sitters: what the West gets wrong about hedging’. Foreign Affairs, 102(3), pp.8-16. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/world/global-south-defense-fence-sitters [Accessed 22 October 2024].
Tabosa, C. (2023). ‘Brazil between global recognition and neutrality over the Russian war against Ukraine’. Journal of Regional Security, 18(1), pp.69-76. Available at: https://aseestant.ceon.rs/index.php/jouregsec/article/view/41792 [Accessed 20 November 2024].
Van Gorp, B. (2005). ‘Where is the Frame?: Victims and Intruders in the Belgian Press Coverage of the Asylum Issue’. European Journal of Communication, 20(4), pp.484–507. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0267323105058253 [Accessed 3 May 2024].
Zaller, J. R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University
TSF. (2023). Zelensky lembra a Lula que ‘a guerra não é no Brasil’ e afasta concessões territoriais. TSF, 29 August. Available at: https://www.tsf.pt/mundo/zelensky-lembra-a-lula-que-a-guerra-nao-e-no-brasil-e-afasta-concessoes-territoriais-16936490.html [Accessed 16 June 2024].
Znojek, B. (2023). ‘Brazil Engages Unconvincingly in Mediating End of Russia’s War Against Ukraine’. PISM Bulletin. Available at: https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=1162571 [Accessed 28 August 2024].
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Joris Alberdingk Thijm, Felipe Leal Albuquerque
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Os Direitos Autorais dos artigos publicados na Revista Mural Internacional pertencem ao(s) seu(s) respectivo(s) autor(es), com os direitos de primeira publicação cedidos à Revista Mural Internacional, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição, a qual permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista. Em virtude de aparecerem na Mural Internacional, o material criado por você pode ser distribuído, copiado e exibido por terceiros. O trabalho original deve ser citado e apresentar um link para o artigo disponível no site da revista em que foi publicado, de acordo com os termos da Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional adotado por esta Revista.
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
