Trier directed the comedy. Any person that is even somewhat familiar with the work on the Dane, at the earliest news of your, should a minimum of a bit surpised, sometimes more correct - not believe the source. Although in truth, have you thought to believe? Trier, to start with, is a frontrunner, a guy who will not tolerate to walk the beaten path and literally re-opens cinema in reference to his every film. So why not? You should a comedy?
But Trier always knew ways to outwit everyone and offer a real trick which the jaw often went into an impartial walk. He did not change himself this occassion either ... Comedy? Well, of course. Did anyone really expect a comedy inside standard, classic, disgustingly banal understanding from the word? Lars is not like that. Instead of this, he slipped the naive viewer into fusion from comedy, social drama, and perhaps some semblance of whether thriller or simply a detective. The outcome would be a movie which was outrageously topical: about losers and selfish people; about how exactly people build and destroy walls of misunderstanding in relationships; a movie about the fear of not being loved, well, also about any office atmosphere, which through the sane person, even in rapid sequence, will generate a clerk, using its internal cockroaches how big is a little Godzilla.
When you're getting started, it will seem how the film may be very simple and poor in good fresh ideas, as being a church rat for dollars. But it wasn't there. That which was supposed to become sitcom become an extremely deep philosophical parable with social connotations. While doing so, no person deterred humor from the action, and there are even some moments once you laugh - besides somehow maliciously and deeply in your consciousness, but it's also possible to frankly give your emotions a voice.
Trier, of course, plays with the viewer, 123movies leaving probably the most delicious towards finale, and through the plot, its formation and setting, only throws small pieces, forcing emotions to figure, plus the visit rest for enough time being. Only after the last credits, when you sit in bewilderment and continue to understand what the heck that it was now, waste a business office and gray mosaic slowly begin to make around my head, in the entire picture of which happens to be buried what only by far the most attentive and thoughtful viewer can see.
Trier knows how to create the impression of a reputable storyteller and in some cases if he manipulates, he is doing it just for the benefit of the viewer himself. Perhaps that is why the actors in his paintings always play in such a way that they do not create the impression of falsity and insincerity. Often it even seems that on the screen there include the most real clerks, losers, actors, bosses along with other inhabitants of a small stuffy office while in the picture. Trier does not need expensive, but what can there be, just no less than some interesting decorations. In The Biggest Boss, we percieve a setting generates the bottom in Manderlea and Dogville look very interesting inside background. At least, doesn't necessarily choke like a smallish, cramped and form of boring office space.
Realism is primarily, therefore music is likewise useless. Should we often hear music in actual, just conversing with someone or pondering our daily bread? It is actually unlikely. ... So we do not listen to Trier. Scenery, music, actors ... oh yeah! A brand new feature with the maestro also appeared in the newest film. Now younger crowd provides a storyteller, happening stage along with comments before you start, end and middle of the picture. Such performances look quite cute and charming, crowning the film such as as a smaller but bright cherry crowns the top of the a sizable and exquisite cake.
Well, and a handful of words need to be said about the next invention in the Danish genius - "Automavision” ;.A really cool thing. After the 1st reports the fact that entire film was filmed without having the participation in the operator, I somehow expected more tin, much above I received in the end. Well, yes, in places faces of people are halved, you will not show the interlocutors, but some kind of nonsense, but all at once everything does not bother at all, but only brings another area of realism in the picture.
Conclusion: Trier filmed a movie that's passable for himself and strong for some other director, which leaves feelings of understatement and depth, to get to which you have to spend a long time and effort.
Good comedies are not harmless
por Lachlan Hennessy (2021-03-29)
Trier directed the comedy. Any person that is even somewhat familiar with the work on the Dane, at the earliest news of your, should a minimum of a bit surpised, sometimes more correct - not believe the source. Although in truth, have you thought to believe? Trier, to start with, is a frontrunner, a guy who will not tolerate to walk the beaten path and literally re-opens cinema in reference to his every film. So why not? You should a comedy?But Trier always knew ways to outwit everyone and offer a real trick which the jaw often went into an impartial walk. He did not change himself this occassion either ... Comedy? Well, of course. Did anyone really expect a comedy inside standard, classic, disgustingly banal understanding from the word? Lars is not like that. Instead of this, he slipped the naive viewer into fusion from comedy, social drama, and perhaps some semblance of whether thriller or simply a detective. The outcome would be a movie which was outrageously topical: about losers and selfish people; about how exactly people build and destroy walls of misunderstanding in relationships; a movie about the fear of not being loved, well, also about any office atmosphere, which through the sane person, even in rapid sequence, will generate a clerk, using its internal cockroaches how big is a little Godzilla.
When you're getting started, it will seem how the film may be very simple and poor in good fresh ideas, as being a church rat for dollars. But it wasn't there. That which was supposed to become sitcom become an extremely deep philosophical parable with social connotations. While doing so, no person deterred humor from the action, and there are even some moments once you laugh - besides somehow maliciously and deeply in your consciousness, but it's also possible to frankly give your emotions a voice.
Trier, of course, plays with the viewer, 123movies leaving probably the most delicious towards finale, and through the plot, its formation and setting, only throws small pieces, forcing emotions to figure, plus the visit rest for enough time being. Only after the last credits, when you sit in bewilderment and continue to understand what the heck that it was now, waste a business office and gray mosaic slowly begin to make around my head, in the entire picture of which happens to be buried what only by far the most attentive and thoughtful viewer can see.
Trier knows how to create the impression of a reputable storyteller and in some cases if he manipulates, he is doing it just for the benefit of the viewer himself. Perhaps that is why the actors in his paintings always play in such a way that they do not create the impression of falsity and insincerity. Often it even seems that on the screen there include the most real clerks, losers, actors, bosses along with other inhabitants of a small stuffy office while in the picture. Trier does not need expensive, but what can there be, just no less than some interesting decorations. In The Biggest Boss, we percieve a setting generates the bottom in Manderlea and Dogville look very interesting inside background. At least, doesn't necessarily choke like a smallish, cramped and form of boring office space.
Realism is primarily, therefore music is likewise useless. Should we often hear music in actual, just conversing with someone or pondering our daily bread? It is actually unlikely. ... So we do not listen to Trier. Scenery, music, actors ... oh yeah! A brand new feature with the maestro also appeared in the newest film. Now younger crowd provides a storyteller, happening stage along with comments before you start, end and middle of the picture. Such performances look quite cute and charming, crowning the film such as as a smaller but bright cherry crowns the top of the a sizable and exquisite cake.
Well, and a handful of words need to be said about the next invention in the Danish genius - "Automavision” ;.A really cool thing. After the 1st reports the fact that entire film was filmed without having the participation in the operator, I somehow expected more tin, much above I received in the end. Well, yes, in places faces of people are halved, you will not show the interlocutors, but some kind of nonsense, but all at once everything does not bother at all, but only brings another area of realism in the picture.
Conclusion: Trier filmed a movie that's passable for himself and strong for some other director, which leaves feelings of understatement and depth, to get to which you have to spend a long time and effort.