Trier directed the comedy. Any individual who's even slightly familiar with the work in the Dane, at the earliest news of your, should a minimum of very impressed, plus more correct - not believe the source. Although the fact is, have you thought to believe? Trier, first of all, is a frontrunner, men who doesn't like to steer the beaten path and literally re-opens cinema in reference to his every film. Consider? You could start to a comedy?
But Trier always knew how you can outwit everyone and present such a trick the jaw often went into a completely independent walk. He could not change himself these times either ... Comedy? Well, of course. Did anyone really expect a comedy in the standard, classic, disgustingly banal understanding from the word? Lars is as opposed to that. Instead coming from all this, he slipped the naive viewer into fusion from comedy, social drama, and also some semblance of a thriller or simply a detective. The end result was obviously a movie that was outrageously topical: about losers and selfish people; on how people build and destroy walls of misunderstanding in relationships; a show regarding the anxiety about not being loved, well, also about a cubicle atmosphere, which in the sane person, even eventually, will create a clerk, featuring a internal cockroaches the size of a compact Godzilla.
At first, it will seem the film is very simple and easy poor in good fresh ideas, just like a church rat for dollars. But it was not there. The thing that was supposed to be a sitcom became a somewhat deep philosophical parable with social connotations. At the same time, no person not power on humor from the experience, and there are even some moments once you laugh - but not only somehow maliciously and deeply with your consciousness, but it's also possible to frankly give your feelings a voice.
Trier, bear in mind, plays using the viewer, leaving essentially the most delicious towards finale, and during the plot, its formation and setting, only throws small pieces, forcing emotions to figure, plus the check out rest for time being. Only after one more credits, after you sit in bewilderment so you can understand what the heck it was now, waste an office and grey mosaic slowly begin to form inside my head, in the actual picture of which can be buried what only probably the most attentive and thoughtful viewer can see.
Trier learns how to create the sense of a genuine storyteller as well as if he manipulates, he does it mainly for the benefit of the viewer himself. Perhaps this is why the actors in their paintings always play so that they just do not create the sense of falsity and insincerity. It often even appears as if on screen there include the most real clerks, losers, actors, bosses and other inhabitants of a tiny stuffy office in the picture. Trier does not need expensive, but what could there be, just at the least some interesting decorations. In The Biggest Boss, we see an environment which makes a floor in Manderlea and Dogville look very worthwhile from the background. At the least, it won't choke like a tiny, cramped and form of boring office space.
Realism is certainly, therefore music can be useless. Should we often hear music in the real world, just discussing with someone or planning on our daily bread? It is unlikely. ... So and we don't hear from Trier. Scenery, music, actors ... by the way! A different feature from the maestro also appeared in the latest film. Now young drivers . provides for a storyteller, happening stage along with his comments at the beginning, 123movies end and middle of the picture. Such performances look quite cute and charming, crowning the film such as as a small but bright cherry crowns the top of a large and delightful cake.
Well, and a few words should be said about the following invention in the Danish genius - "Automavision” ;.A really cool thing. After the primary reports the fact that entire film was filmed minus the participation with the operator, I somehow expected more tin, much in excess of I received within the end. Well, yes, in places the faces of folks are halved, the camera does not show the interlocutors, but some kind of nonsense, but at the same time everything doesn't bother whatsoever, only brings another part of realism in the picture.
Conclusion: Trier filmed a show that was passable for himself and strong for any director, which leaves a sense of understatement and depth, to get to which it is advisable to spend time and effort and effort.
Good comedies will never be harmless
por Michelle Holman (2021-03-29)
But Trier always knew how you can outwit everyone and present such a trick the jaw often went into a completely independent walk. He could not change himself these times either ... Comedy? Well, of course. Did anyone really expect a comedy in the standard, classic, disgustingly banal understanding from the word? Lars is as opposed to that. Instead coming from all this, he slipped the naive viewer into fusion from comedy, social drama, and also some semblance of a thriller or simply a detective. The end result was obviously a movie that was outrageously topical: about losers and selfish people; on how people build and destroy walls of misunderstanding in relationships; a show regarding the anxiety about not being loved, well, also about a cubicle atmosphere, which in the sane person, even eventually, will create a clerk, featuring a internal cockroaches the size of a compact Godzilla.
At first, it will seem the film is very simple and easy poor in good fresh ideas, just like a church rat for dollars. But it was not there. The thing that was supposed to be a sitcom became a somewhat deep philosophical parable with social connotations. At the same time, no person not power on humor from the experience, and there are even some moments once you laugh - but not only somehow maliciously and deeply with your consciousness, but it's also possible to frankly give your feelings a voice.
Trier, bear in mind, plays using the viewer, leaving essentially the most delicious towards finale, and during the plot, its formation and setting, only throws small pieces, forcing emotions to figure, plus the check out rest for time being. Only after one more credits, after you sit in bewilderment so you can understand what the heck it was now, waste an office and grey mosaic slowly begin to form inside my head, in the actual picture of which can be buried what only probably the most attentive and thoughtful viewer can see.
Trier learns how to create the sense of a genuine storyteller as well as if he manipulates, he does it mainly for the benefit of the viewer himself. Perhaps this is why the actors in their paintings always play so that they just do not create the sense of falsity and insincerity. It often even appears as if on screen there include the most real clerks, losers, actors, bosses and other inhabitants of a tiny stuffy office in the picture. Trier does not need expensive, but what could there be, just at the least some interesting decorations. In The Biggest Boss, we see an environment which makes a floor in Manderlea and Dogville look very worthwhile from the background. At the least, it won't choke like a tiny, cramped and form of boring office space.
Realism is certainly, therefore music can be useless. Should we often hear music in the real world, just discussing with someone or planning on our daily bread? It is unlikely. ... So and we don't hear from Trier. Scenery, music, actors ... by the way! A different feature from the maestro also appeared in the latest film. Now young drivers . provides for a storyteller, happening stage along with his comments at the beginning, 123movies end and middle of the picture. Such performances look quite cute and charming, crowning the film such as as a small but bright cherry crowns the top of a large and delightful cake.
Well, and a few words should be said about the following invention in the Danish genius - "Automavision” ;.A really cool thing. After the primary reports the fact that entire film was filmed minus the participation with the operator, I somehow expected more tin, much in excess of I received within the end. Well, yes, in places the faces of folks are halved, the camera does not show the interlocutors, but some kind of nonsense, but at the same time everything doesn't bother whatsoever, only brings another part of realism in the picture.
Conclusion: Trier filmed a show that was passable for himself and strong for any director, which leaves a sense of understatement and depth, to get to which it is advisable to spend time and effort and effort.