Fiscalización y reversión de los beneficios empresariales e industriales mediante la Acción de in rem verso en la civilización romana clásica / Control and reversal of business and industrial benefits by Action in rem verso in classical roman civiliza...
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/rqi.2016.23152Palavras-chave:
Beneficios empresariales, enriquecimiento injusto, quiebra del peculio industrial, reversión de beneficios in rem versio por el empresario – dueño y sus herederosResumo
Trabalho enviado em 08 de junho de 2016. Aceito em 24 de agosto de 2016.
DOI: 10.12957/rqi.2016.23152
Resumen
Con el presente trabajo de investigación, pretendemos hacer un análisis del nacimiento y la evolución jurídica clásica de la actio de in rem verso. En efecto, aunque la acción pretoria nació junto con la actio de peculio en la misma fórmula, sin embargo ambas acciones dieron lugar a dos procesos paralelos y simultáneos que se resolvían de forma independiente. Además, el intenso y libre juego del tráfico empresarial y mercantil durante el Imperio, probablemente posibilitó que la actio de in rem verso se pudiese ejercitar de una manera independiente de aquélla. Por último, el pretor y la jurisprudencia clásica han puesto de relieve que la acción goza de una naturaleza jurídica propia, sustantiva e independiente de la acción de peculio
Palabras Claves: Beneficios empresariales, enriquecimiento injusto, quiebra del peculio industrial, reversión de beneficios in rem versio por el empresario – dueño y sus herederos
Abstract
With the present work of investigation we try to do an analysis of the birth and the juridical classic evolution of the actio in rem versio. In effect, though the pretorian action was born combined to the actio of peculium in the same formula, nevertheless both actions gave place to two parallel and simultaneous processes that were solved of independent form. In addition, the impressive and free game of the managerial and mercantile traffic during the Empire made possible that the actio de in rem versio turn it was possible to exercise in a way independent from that one. Finally, the praetor and the classic jurisprudence have emphasized that the action enjoys a juridical own, nature substantive and independent from the action of peculiu.
Keywords: Managerial benefits, unjust enrichment, bankruptcy of the industrial peculium, reinvesting profits in rem versio for the businessman – owner and his inheritors
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os Direitos autorais patrimoniais dos artigos publicados pertencem à Revista Quaestio Iuris. A reprodução total dos artigos desta revista em outras publicações, ou para qualquer outra utilidade, é permitida a todos, para que distribuam, remixem, adaptem e criem a partir do trabalho aqui publicado, mesmo para fins comerciais, desde que atribuam o devido crédito pela criação original ao autor e o crédito à Revista Quaestio Iuris pela primeira publicação do trabalho. A Revista Quaestio Iuris obedece aos termos da licença Creative Commons de Atribuição 4.0 Internacional CC-BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), em consonância com a legislação autoral brasileira, Lei 9.610/1998.
The patrimonial copyrights of the published articles belong to the Quaestio Iuris Law Review. The total reproduction of the articles of this review in other publications, or for any other use, is allowed to all, to distribute, remix, adapt and create from the work published here, even for commercial purposes, as long as they give due credit for the original creation to the author and credit to Quaestio Iuris Lae Review for the first publication of the work. The Quaestio Iuris Law Review complies with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), in accordance with brazilian copyright law, Law 9.610/1998.
